Think! Evidence

Alternative Representations in Algebraic Problem Solving: When are Graphs Better Than Equations?

Show simple item record

dc.creator Mielicki, Marta K
dc.creator Wiley, Jennifer
dc.date 2016-01-29T20:25:16Z
dc.date.accessioned 2016-03-28T09:19:45Z
dc.date.available 2016-03-28T09:19:45Z
dc.identifier http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/jps/vol9/iss1/1
dc.identifier http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1181&context=jps
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/31611
dc.description Successful algebraic problem solving entails adaptability of solution methods using different representations. Prior research has suggested that students are more likely to prefer symbolic solution methods (equations) over graphical ones, even when graphical methods should be more efficient. However, this research has not tested how representation format might affect solution success, and whether the efficiency of solution varies depending on the nature of the problem solving task. This study addressed the question of whether symbolic or graphical representation format provides different affordances with respect to two different types of problems: computation and interpretation. Graphical representation was found to facilitate problem solving among college students, and problems that required the comparison of slopes were more difficult when presented in a symbolic format than in graphical format.
dc.format application/pdf
dc.publisher Purdue University
dc.source The Journal of Problem Solving
dc.subject Multiple representations
dc.subject algebra
dc.subject slope
dc.title Alternative Representations in Algebraic Problem Solving: When are Graphs Better Than Equations?
dc.type text


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account