Think! Evidence

Phonological recoding under articulatory suppression

Show simple item record

dc.creator Norris, Dennis
dc.creator Butterfield, S
dc.creator Hall, J
dc.creator Page, M
dc.date 2017-09-25T12:17:51Z
dc.date 2017-09-25T12:17:51Z
dc.date 2017-09-11
dc.date.accessioned 2019-03-20T08:22:53Z
dc.date.available 2019-03-20T08:22:53Z
dc.identifier https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/267370
dc.identifier 10.17863/CAM.13353
dc.identifier.uri https://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/32191
dc.description We report data from an experiment where participants performed immediate serial recall of visually presented words with or without articulatory suppression while also performing homophone or rhyme detection. The separation between homophonous or rhyming pairs in the list was varied. According to the Working Memory model (Baddeley & Hitch, 1974; Baddeley, 1986), suppression should prevent articulatory recoding. Nevertheless, rhyme and homophone detection was well above chance. However, with suppression, participants showed a greater tendency to false-alarm to orthographically related foils (e.g. GIVE-FIVE). This pattern is similar to that observed in short-term memory patients.
dc.language en
dc.publisher Springer
dc.publisher Memory and Cognition
dc.rights Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject working memory
dc.subject articulatory suppression
dc.subject phonological recording
dc.subject memory
dc.title Phonological recoding under articulatory suppression
dc.type Article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
10.3758%2Fs13421-017-0754-8.pdf 528.9Kb application/pdf View/Open
Norris_PhonRecoding_31-7-17.pdf 423.5Kb application/pdf View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account