Think! Evidence

How are age-related differences in sleep quality associated with health outcomes? An epidemiological investigation in a UK cohort of 2406 adults.

Show simple item record

dc.creator Gadie, Andrew
dc.creator Shafto, Meredith
dc.creator Leng, Yue
dc.creator Kievit, Rogier
dc.creator Cam-CAN,
dc.date 2018-04-10T17:01:06Z
dc.date 2018-04-10T17:01:06Z
dc.date 2017-07-31
dc.date.accessioned 2019-03-20T08:23:00Z
dc.date.available 2019-03-20T08:23:00Z
dc.identifier https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/274748
dc.identifier 10.17863/CAM.21887
dc.identifier.uri https://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/32209
dc.description OBJECTIVES: To examine age-related differences in self-reported sleep quality and their associations with health outcomes across four domains: physical health, cognitive health, mental health and neural health. SETTING: Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) is a cohort study in East Anglia/England, which collected self-reported health and lifestyle questions as well as a range of objective measures from healthy adults. PARTICIPANTS: 2406 healthy adults (age 18-98) answered questions about their sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)) and measures of physical, cognitive, mental and neural health. A subset of 641 individuals provided measures of brain structure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: PSQI scores of sleep and scores across tests within the four domains of health. Latent class analysis (LCA) is used to identify sleep types across the lifespan. Bayesian regressions quantify the presence, and absence, of relationships between sleep quality and health measures. RESULTS: Better self-reported sleep is generally associated with better health outcomes, strongly so for mental health, moderately for cognitive and physical health, but not for sleep quality and neural health. LCA identified four sleep types: 'good sleepers' (68.1%, most frequent in middle age), 'inefficient sleepers' (14.01%, most frequent in old age), 'delayed sleepers' (9.28%, most frequent in young adults) and 'poor sleepers' (8.5%, most frequent in old age). There is little evidence for interactions between sleep quality and age on health outcomes. Finally, we observe U-shaped associations between sleep duration and mental health (depression and anxiety) as well as self-reported general health, such that both short and long sleep were associated with poorer outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Lifespan changes in sleep quality are multifaceted and not captured well by summary measures, but instead should be viewed as as partially independent symptoms that vary in prevalence across the lifespan. Better self-reported sleep is associated with better health outcomes, and the strength of these associations differs across health domains. Notably, we do not observe associations between self-reported sleep quality and white matter.
dc.format Electronic
dc.language eng
dc.publisher BMJ open
dc.rights Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject Cam-CAN
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Prevalence
dc.subject Bayes Theorem
dc.subject Mental Health
dc.subject Cognition
dc.subject Sleep
dc.subject Age Factors
dc.subject Health Status
dc.subject Anisotropy
dc.subject Adolescent
dc.subject Adult
dc.subject Aged
dc.subject Aged, 80 and over
dc.subject Middle Aged
dc.subject Female
dc.subject Male
dc.subject Young Adult
dc.subject White Matter
dc.subject Sleep Wake Disorders
dc.subject United Kingdom
dc.title How are age-related differences in sleep quality associated with health outcomes? An epidemiological investigation in a UK cohort of 2406 adults.
dc.type Article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
How are age-rel ... cohort of 2406 adults.pdf 1.739Mb application/pdf View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account