Think! Evidence

Reconsidering the Imaging Evidence Used to Implicate Prediction Error as the Driving Force behind Learning.

Show simple item record

dc.creator Čevora, Jiří
dc.creator Henson, Richard
dc.date 2018-04-11T10:50:53Z
dc.date 2018-04-11T10:50:53Z
dc.date 2017-01
dc.date.accessioned 2019-03-20T08:23:01Z
dc.date.available 2019-03-20T08:23:01Z
dc.identifier https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/274759
dc.identifier 10.17863/CAM.21897
dc.identifier.uri https://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/32212
dc.description In this paper, we review the evidence that learning is driven by signaling of Prediction Error [PE] by some neurons. We model associative learning in artificial neural networks using Hebbian (non-PE) learning algorithms to investigate whether the data used to implicate PE in learning can arise without actual PE computation. We conclude that the metabolic demands of synaptic change during Hebbian learning would produce a PE-correlated component in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), which suggests that the research used to imply PE in learning is currently inconclusive.
dc.format Electronic-eCollection
dc.language eng
dc.publisher Frontiers in psychology
dc.rights Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.title Reconsidering the Imaging Evidence Used to Implicate Prediction Error as the Driving Force behind Learning.
dc.type Article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
8128.pdf 178.0Kb application/pdf View/Open
Reconsidering t ... Force behind Learning.pdf 606.9Kb application/pdf View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account