Think! Evidence

Cognitive neuroscience: More is different

Show simple item record

dc.creator Kievit, Rogier
dc.date 2018-03-29T14:15:04Z
dc.date 2018-03-29T14:15:04Z
dc.date 2017-07-24
dc.date.accessioned 2019-03-20T08:23:10Z
dc.date.available 2019-03-20T08:23:10Z
dc.identifier https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/274517
dc.identifier 10.17863/CAM.21635
dc.identifier.uri https://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/32243
dc.description Throughout history, humans have had to make decisions based on numerical comparisons of competing choices. Does this part of the forest yield more fruit than the other? What route leads to more or fewer violent encounters? Which shop has better deals? Although a computer with unlimited capacity could simply compute precise averages, humans often (by necessity) employ other methods. In a new set of experiments, Spitzer et al. asked people to decide which of two streams of numbers had a higher average value. Doing so, they provide new and exciting insights into the strategies humans employ to compare numerical magnitudes.
dc.publisher Springer Nature
dc.publisher Nature Human Behaviour
dc.title Cognitive neuroscience: More is different
dc.type Article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Kievit_Moreisdifferent_Nhumbehav2017.pdf 338.5Kb application/pdf View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account