Think! Evidence

Comparing and validating methods of reading instruction using behavioural and neural findings in an artificial orthography.

Show simple item record

dc.creator Taylor, JSH
dc.creator Davis, Matthew
dc.creator Rastle, Kathleen
dc.date 2018-05-03T10:49:37Z
dc.date 2018-05-03T10:49:37Z
dc.date 2017-06
dc.date.accessioned 2019-03-20T08:23:11Z
dc.date.available 2019-03-20T08:23:11Z
dc.identifier https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/275496
dc.identifier 10.17863/CAM.22732
dc.identifier.uri https://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/32250
dc.description There is strong scientific consensus that emphasizing print-to-sound relationships is critical when learning to read alphabetic languages. Nevertheless, reading instruction varies across English-speaking countries, from intensive phonic training to multicuing environments that teach sound- and meaning-based strategies. We sought to understand the behavioral and neural consequences of these differences in relative emphasis. We taught 24 English-speaking adults to read 2 sets of 24 novel words (e.g., /buv/, /sig/), written in 2 different unfamiliar orthographies. Following pretraining on oral vocabulary, participants learned to read the novel words over 8 days. Training in 1 language was biased toward print-to-sound mappings while training in the other language was biased toward print-to-meaning mappings. Results showed striking benefits of print-sound training on reading aloud, generalization, and comprehension of single words. Univariate analyses of fMRI data collected at the end of training showed that print-meaning relative to print-sound relative training increased neural effort in dorsal pathway regions involved in reading aloud. Conversely, activity in ventral pathway brain regions involved in reading comprehension was no different following print-meaning versus print-sound training. Multivariate analyses validated our artificial language approach, showing high similarity between the spatial distribution of fMRI activity during artificial and English word reading. Our results suggest that early literacy education should focus on the systematicities present in print-to-sound relationships in alphabetic languages, rather than teaching meaning-based strategies, in order to enhance both reading aloud and comprehension of written words. (PsycINFO Database Record
dc.format Print-Electronic
dc.language eng
dc.publisher APA
dc.publisher Journal of experimental psychology. General
dc.rights Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject Brain
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Magnetic Resonance Imaging
dc.subject Brain Mapping
dc.subject Language
dc.subject Comprehension
dc.subject Reading
dc.subject Vocabulary
dc.subject Adolescent
dc.subject Adult
dc.subject Female
dc.subject Male
dc.subject Young Adult
dc.title Comparing and validating methods of reading instruction using behavioural and neural findings in an artificial orthography.
dc.type Article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Comparing and v ... artificial orthography.pdf 1.776Mb application/pdf View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account