Think! Evidence

Exploring the Path That Has Led to a Fragmented Curriculum, Driven by High Stakes Testing, Sidelining Science

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Robert Ricketts
dc.contributor Jeremy Szteiter
dc.creator Flaherty, Emily L.
dc.date 2023-05-31T07:00:00Z
dc.date 2023-07-14T07:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2024-04-18T06:25:29Z
dc.date.available 2024-04-18T06:25:29Z
dc.identifier https://scholarworks.umb.edu/cct_capstone/408
dc.identifier.uri https://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/32553
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.umb.edu/cct_capstone/408
dc.description <p>This paper explores the current state of science instruction in classrooms, particularly concerning the fragmented curriculum resulting from high-stakes testing and the subsequent side-lining of science education. The study examines the historical context, starting with the implementation of standardized tests such as MCAS (Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System) in 1998 and the subsequent impact of the No Child Left Behind Act in 2001. These reforms led to a punitive system for underachieving schools and a narrowing of instructional time for subjects other than math and English Language Arts (ELA). The focus on improving test scores resulted in limited time allocated for science instruction, with studies indicating that, on average, only 20 minutes per day is dedicated to science and social studies. The paper argues for a shift towards an integrated curriculum that nurtures the whole child and proposes integrating science and social studies content into ELA programs. By aligning units and themes, teachers can create opportunities for cross-disciplinary learning that enriches the ELA curriculum while supporting science education. The paper provides various models and examples to guide the implementation of curriculum integration, emphasizing the importance of hands-on science experiences and their contribution to reading skills and comprehension.</p>
dc.subject science instruction
dc.subject standardized tests
dc.subject curriculum fragmentation
dc.subject integrated curriculum
dc.subject whole child
dc.subject ELA
dc.subject cross-disciplinary learning
dc.subject curriculum integration
dc.subject hands-on science experiences
dc.subject reading skills
dc.subject comprehension
dc.subject Elementary Education
dc.subject Science and Mathematics Education
dc.title Exploring the Path That Has Led to a Fragmented Curriculum, Driven by High Stakes Testing, Sidelining Science
dc.thesis Open Access Capstone
dc.thesis Master of Arts (MA)


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account