dc.contributor.author |
Kopelman, Richard E. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Davis, Anne L. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2015-03-11T13:32:44Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2015-03-11T13:32:44Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2004 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education
Volume 2, Issue 2, pages 203–206, July 2004 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1540-4609 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2004.00045.x |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/38 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
To guess is inexpensive; to guess wrong can be very costly. Ancient Chinese proverb. In this teaching brief, we describe a technique for demonstrating how cognitive heuristics subtly (and sometimes perniciously) affect decision making. More specifically, we describe a method for illustrating the anchoring effect. Awareness of this effect is, logically, the first step toward obviating and/or removing the potential biases that may result from basing decisions on unreliable/irrelevant information. Cognitive heuristics are mental mechanisms used to cope with the uncertainty and complexity of the decision-making environment (Bazerman, 2002). By reducing the amount of information taken into consideration, heuristics simplify and speed up the decision-making process (Schwenk, 1986). But the heuristics employed can have negative consequences, resulting in suboptimal decisions. |
|
dc.subject |
Heuristics and biases |
|
dc.title |
A Demonstration of the Anchoring Effect |
|
dc.type |
Article |
|