dc.creator |
Ian Liebenberg |
|
dc.creator |
Abel Esterhuyse |
|
dc.date |
2011-08-01T00:00:00Z |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2015-07-20T20:08:35Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2015-07-20T20:08:35Z |
|
dc.identifier |
10.5787/39-1-98 |
|
dc.identifier |
2224-0020 |
|
dc.identifier |
https://doaj.org/article/aec7a4900d134f24a377c3bfc7373ef0 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/8326 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://doaj.org/article/aec7a4900d134f24a377c3bfc7373ef0 |
|
dc.description |
Craig A. Snyder, in a book titled Contemporary Security and Strategy, noted that the broad idea of security provides strategic studies with institutional status and political legitimacy. Yet, the military core endows strategic studies, as a scholarly discipline, with intellectual coherence.1 This edition of Scientia Militaria, the South African Journal of Military Studies, reflects this reality with a very broad range of articles – from sexual behaviour and poetry to military intervention. Yet, the underlying commonality is an emphasis on military issues. |
|
dc.language |
English |
|
dc.publisher |
University of Stellenbosch. Faculty of Military Science (Military Academy) |
|
dc.relation |
http://scientiamilitaria.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/98 |
|
dc.relation |
https://doaj.org/toc/2224-0020 |
|
dc.source |
Scientia Militaria : South African Journal of Military Studies, Vol 39, Iss 1 (2011) |
|
dc.subject |
Military Science |
|
dc.subject |
U |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Military Science |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Technology and Engineering |
|
dc.subject |
Military Science |
|
dc.subject |
U |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Military Science |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Technology and Engineering |
|
dc.subject |
Military Science |
|
dc.subject |
U |
|
dc.subject |
Military Science |
|
dc.subject |
U |
|
dc.subject |
Military Science |
|
dc.subject |
U |
|
dc.title |
FROM THE EDITORS |
|
dc.type |
Article |
|