Think! Evidence

Considerations on Defence Thinking in Post-1994 South Africa with Special Reference to Post-conflict Reconstruction and Development

Show simple item record

dc.creator Theo Neethling
dc.date 2013-02-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-07-20T20:08:50Z
dc.date.available 2015-07-20T20:08:50Z
dc.identifier 10.5787/40-3-1037
dc.identifier 2224-0020
dc.identifier https://doaj.org/article/92db3f797d624a6a953a1cf738b909a6
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/8506
dc.identifier.uri https://doaj.org/article/92db3f797d624a6a953a1cf738b909a6
dc.description <p>This article revisits some of the main arguments presented (in the South African context) since the late 1990s in relation to the regional security demands placed on the South African National Defence Force (SANDF) on the one hand, and the configuration of the force design imposed on the SANDF on the other.  These issues are of great relevance to the South African Department of Defence’s recent (2012) official pronouncements and related defence thinking on the current and future external role of the South African military, specifically with regard to post-conflict reconstruction and development.  The aim of the article is to examine the dynamics of recent years – philosophical and practical – that gave rise to the policy “move” or “shift” from <em>defence in a democracy</em> (1998) to <em>defence, security and development</em> (2012).<a href="#_edn1">[i]</a> In addition, the article aims to analyse and discuss the new comprehensive guidelines for defence force design in the <em>Draft</em> <em>Defence Review 2012 </em>and reflects on some of the most important policy implications for the SANDF in this regard – specifically given the demands placed on the SANDF in the field of post-conflict reconstruction and development.  The author contends that the Department of Defence has now gained a clearer idea or perspective of what the future role(s) of the South African military should be through the assessment of its function, principles and goals expounded in the<em> Draft Defence Review 2012</em>.</p> <div><br /> <hr size="1" /><div><p><a href="#_ednref1">[i]</a> At the time of writing it was planned to replace the <em>Defence Review 1998</em>, which was published under the theme of <em>Defence in a democracy</em>, with a new <em>Defence Review 2012</em>, to be published under the theme <em>Defence, security, development</em>.</p></div></div>
dc.language English
dc.publisher University of Stellenbosch. Faculty of Military Science (Military Academy)
dc.relation http://scientiamilitaria.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/1037
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/2224-0020
dc.source Scientia Militaria : South African Journal of Military Studies, Vol 40, Iss 3 (2013)
dc.subject Post-conflict reconstruction and development
dc.subject Defence Review
dc.subject Defence thinking
dc.subject Peace missions
dc.subject South African National Defence Force
dc.subject Defence capabilities
dc.subject Military Science
dc.subject U
dc.subject DOAJ:Military Science
dc.subject DOAJ:Technology and Engineering
dc.subject Military Science
dc.subject U
dc.subject DOAJ:Military Science
dc.subject DOAJ:Technology and Engineering
dc.subject Military Science
dc.subject U
dc.subject Military Science
dc.subject U
dc.subject Military Science
dc.subject U
dc.title Considerations on Defence Thinking in Post-1994 South Africa with Special Reference to Post-conflict Reconstruction and Development
dc.type Article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account