Think! Evidence

The Lessons of the Border War

Show simple item record

dc.creator Leopold Scholtz
dc.date 2013-02-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-07-20T20:09:37Z
dc.date.available 2015-07-20T20:09:37Z
dc.identifier 10.5787/40-3-1039
dc.identifier 2224-0020
dc.identifier https://doaj.org/article/29a299ebf3a742e2b3ca6b535edd614a
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/9157
dc.identifier.uri https://doaj.org/article/29a299ebf3a742e2b3ca6b535edd614a
dc.description A quarter of a century after the end of the Border War, the SANDF’s institutional memory of the conflict is slowly fading.  And yet there are several lessons emanating from the war, which are relevant to the Defence Force.  This article attempts to map out some of these lessons. These lessons are as follows. (1) The need for combined arms units such as 61 Mechanised Battalion Group and 4 SAI, being a mix of mechanised infantry, armoured cars, tanks, artillery and support troops on battalion level. (2) The importance of logistic support, something that was not always sufficient during Operations Moduler, Hooper and Packer in 1987–1988. (3) Reserve force units must be adequately retrained when utilised in operations. (4) During the war, there was a gap in the Army’s anti-aircraft capability.  This gap has not been rectified since. (5) In order to be able to command the air above a battlefield, an aerial refuelling capability for the SAAF is essential. (6) The Army needs a proper air assault and maritime amphibious capability. (7) When deciding to engage in a warlike operation, avoid the incremental commitment, which characterised both Operation Savannah in 1975 and Moduler in 1988. (8) While the field units fight on the battlefield, do not micromanage things from above.  As long as the units keep within the political and operational parameters set by the politicians and generals, let the field commanders exercise their own initiative. (9) Make a renewed study of the Army’s mobile warfare doctrine of the seventies and eighties, as developed by officers such as Major General Roland de Vries. (10) Lastly, see to it that officers are not just <em>trained</em>, but intellectually <em>educated</em> about war as well.
dc.language English
dc.publisher University of Stellenbosch. Faculty of Military Science (Military Academy)
dc.relation http://scientiamilitaria.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/1039
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/2224-0020
dc.source Scientia Militaria : South African Journal of Military Studies, Vol 40, Iss 3 (2013)
dc.subject Border War
dc.subject SADF
dc.subject SANDF
dc.subject Combined arms
dc.subject Reserve force
dc.subject Operation Savannah
dc.subject Operation Moduler
dc.subject Mobile warfare doctrine
dc.subject Military education
dc.subject Military Science
dc.subject U
dc.subject DOAJ:Military Science
dc.subject DOAJ:Technology and Engineering
dc.subject Military Science
dc.subject U
dc.subject DOAJ:Military Science
dc.subject DOAJ:Technology and Engineering
dc.subject Military Science
dc.subject U
dc.subject Military Science
dc.subject U
dc.subject Military Science
dc.subject U
dc.title The Lessons of the Border War
dc.type Article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account