Think! Evidence

Intrinsic constraints on cross-modal plasticity

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Mriganka Sur.
dc.contributor Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Brain and Cognitive Sciences.
dc.contributor Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Brain and Cognitive Sciences.
dc.creator Ellsworth, Charlene
dc.date 2006-03-29T18:51:45Z
dc.date 2006-03-29T18:51:45Z
dc.date 2004
dc.date 2004
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/32516
dc.identifier 62075212
dc.description Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, 2004.
dc.description Includes bibliographical references (p. 120-125).
dc.description Over the last two decades numerous examples have demonstrated the remarkable plasticity of the developing brain. This plasticity occurs from the level of a single synapse to the repatterning of sensory input. One paradigm that demonstrates this plasticity is the re-routing of sensory input to inappropriate targets. This cross-modal plasticity in an animal model is reminiscent of similar rearrangements in deaf and blind human patients. In these animal models, visual input is induced to innervate the auditory or somatosensory thalamus, MGN and VB respectively, as a result of deafferentation of these nuclei. Such experiments have demonstrated that structures are influenced by their input, and therefore sensory input is able to use alternative pathways for function. This thesis examines the extent to which cues intrinsic to the target provide information to these novel retino-MGN projections. It will consider two examples in which the target structure imposes order onto the incoming sensory input; via intra-nuclei patterning and via a behaviorally relevant efferent pathway. We demonstrate that retinal axons use an ephrin gradient present in the MGN to acquire orderly connections, akin to retinal patterning in visual targets. Using fear conditioning, we show that learning of a visual cue changes when visual input is routed through the auditory pathway. To better understand the intrinsic cues present in a target, we identify a set of genes differentially expressed in the LGN and MGN, which includes a list of transcription factors and putative downstream targets.
dc.description (cont.) Furthermore, we demonstrate that deafferentation of the MGN does not influence these sensory-specific molecular profiles but does create a permissive environment which induces innervation by local axons.
dc.description by Charlene Ellsworth.
dc.description Ph.D.
dc.format 125 p.
dc.format 7580418 bytes
dc.format 7586646 bytes
dc.format application/pdf
dc.format application/pdf
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language eng
dc.publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
dc.rights M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
dc.rights http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subject Brain and Cognitive Sciences.
dc.title Intrinsic constraints on cross-modal plasticity
dc.type Thesis


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
62075212-MIT.pdf 7.586Mb application/pdf View/Open

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
62075212-MIT.pdf 7.586Mb application/pdf View/Open

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
62075212-MIT.pdf 7.586Mb application/pdf View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account