Think! Evidence

Understanding the role of referential processing in sentence complexity

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Edward A.F. Gibson.
dc.contributor Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Brain and Cognitive Sciences.
dc.contributor Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Brain and Cognitive Sciences.
dc.creator Warren, Tessa Cartwright, 1974-
dc.date 2005-08-23T18:08:19Z
dc.date 2005-08-23T18:08:19Z
dc.date 2001
dc.date 2001
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/8187
dc.identifier 50059548
dc.description Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, 2001.
dc.description Includes bibliographical references (p. 123-128).
dc.description Language comprehension requires syntactic, semantic and pragmatic processing. The work presented in this thesis clarifies the role that the resource demands of syntactic and referential processing play in sentence complexity. Results are interpreted within the framework of the Dependency Locality Theory (Gibson, 1998), which provides a hypothesis about how computational resources constrain the process of sentence comprehension. These new results support and further develop the DLT's discourse-based distance metric for computing locality. The experiments presented here were designed to investigate the referential processing load imposed by relating noun phrase (NP) anaphors to their antecedents and to discover the ramifications of increased referential processing load on behavioral measures of language comprehension. Four questionnaire experiments tested the intuitive complexity of doubly nested sentences containing NPs that were differently referentially accessible. These experiments demonstrated that sentences with structural dependencies crossing less accessible referents are judged more difficult than sentences with structural dependencies crossing more accessible referents. They also showed that referential accessibility manipulations had a negligible effect on intuitive complexity in positions that did not interrupt long distance structural dependencies.
dc.description (cont.) Five self-paced word-by-word reading experiments elucidated the time course of the complexity ramifications of increased referential processing. Each of these experiments showed that when less accessible referents interrupted long distance structural dependencies, reading times slowed more at the completion of the structural dependency than at the referent itself. From the results of these experiments it is argued that performing referential processing during an incomplete structural dependency makes accessing the representation of the beginning of the dependency more difficult at the dependency's completion. This finding is important to the development of the DLT, expanding it to take both referential and syntactic processing into account when predicting complexity effects. This work also provides new evidence about the relative processing loads incurred by multiple referential processes, new evidence concerning the mechanisms underlying referent accessibility and new evidence about the allocation of resources to different subprocesses of the human language comprehension system.
dc.description by Tessa Cartwright Warren.
dc.description Ph.D.
dc.format 128 p.
dc.format 12137435 bytes
dc.format 12137195 bytes
dc.format application/pdf
dc.format application/pdf
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language eng
dc.publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
dc.rights M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
dc.rights http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subject Brain and Cognitive Sciences.
dc.title Understanding the role of referential processing in sentence complexity
dc.type Thesis


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
50059548-MIT.pdf 12.13Mb application/pdf View/Open

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
50059548-MIT.pdf 12.13Mb application/pdf View/Open

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
50059548-MIT.pdf 12.13Mb application/pdf View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account