Reviews: edited by Philip Barker

dc.creator	Philip Barker
dc.creator	David Hawkridge
dc.creator	Margaret Bell
dc.creator	Derick Unwin
dc.creator	Barbara B. Seels
dc.creator	Rita C. Richey
dc.date	1996-12-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned	2015-07-20T22:06:19Z
dc.date.available	2015-07-20T22:06:19Z
dc.identifier	10.3402/rlt.v4i2.9970
dc.identifier	2156-7069
dc.identifier	2156-7077
dc.identifier	https://doaj.org/article/f9c8e47c60f142db918ce4e7ceb3c437
dc.identifier.uri	http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/10426
dc.description	This review differs from others we have so far published in ALT-J. In order to offer a multiple perspective on a contentious area, we approached three reviewers. We then asked Barbara Seels and Rita Richey, in the light of the reviews we received, to reconsider their position set out in their book. In addition, Ray McAleese (Heriot- Watt University) has commented both on the reviews and on the reactions to them by Seels and Richey. We welcome any comments you may have.
dc.language	English
dc.relation	http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/9970
dc.relation	https://doaj.org/toc/2156-7069
dc.relation	https://doaj.org/toc/2156-7077
dc.rights	CC BY
dc.source	Research in Learning Technology, Vol 4, Iss 2 (1996)
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	DOAJ:Education
dc.subject	DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	DOAJ:Education
dc.subject	DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.title	Reviews: edited by Philip Barker
dc.type	article