Think! Evidence

Concept mapping and the fundamental problem of moving between knowledge structures

Show simple item record

dc.creator Ian M. Kinchin
dc.date 2012-12-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-07-20T22:06:35Z
dc.date.available 2015-07-20T22:06:35Z
dc.identifier 1989-9572
dc.identifier https://doaj.org/article/f87937827b3d44199982ab795f935473
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/10611
dc.description A concept map provides a ʻsnap shotʼ of a studentʼs understanding that is frozen in time by drawing it out on paper or on a computer screen. However, to represent the dynamic state of student learning, concept maps either need to emphasise dynamism (through the phrases that are chosen to act as links within the propositions that form the map), or need to be viewed as a single perspective on a more complex situation that can only be fully appreciated by considering movement between knowledge structures (e.g. through sequential mapping over time, or by indicating relationships between map structures that represent complementary learning contexts). The recognition of the importance of movement between knowledge structures needs careful management, whether teaching is conducted as a face-to-face activity or (increasingly) as a digital/online activity. Existing models of e-learning development (such as the TPACK model) can be modified to accommodate a multiple perspectives view. When the purpose of teaching is the promotion of studentsʼ ability to move between knowledge structures (rather than acquiring a single structure), the purpose of producing a concept map changes and becomes part of a wider dynamic process of learning, rather than providing a static record of what has already been learnt.
dc.language Spanish
dc.language English
dc.language Portuguese
dc.language French
dc.publisher Universidad de Granada
dc.relation http://www.ugr.es/~jett/pdf/vol04(1)_08_jett_kinchin.pdf
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/1989-9572
dc.rights CC BY-NC-ND
dc.source Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers, Vol 4.1, Iss Special, Pp 96-106 (2012)
dc.subject Complementary knowledge structures
dc.subject qualitative analysis
dc.subject structural transformation.
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.title Concept mapping and the fundamental problem of moving between knowledge structures
dc.type article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account