Think! Evidence

Brazilian version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy: psychometric properties and factor analysis

Show simple item record

dc.creator Paro Helena BMS
dc.creator Daud-Gallotti Renata M
dc.creator Tibério Iolanda C
dc.creator Pinto Rogério MC
dc.creator Martins Mílton A
dc.date 2012-08-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-07-20T22:06:36Z
dc.date.available 2015-07-20T22:06:36Z
dc.identifier 10.1186/1472-6920-12-73
dc.identifier 1472-6920
dc.identifier https://doaj.org/article/f858d23d7671436e98f04d1d081aee6d
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/10629
dc.identifier.uri https://doaj.org/article/f858d23d7671436e98f04d1d081aee6d
dc.description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Empathy is a central characteristic of medical professionalism and has recently gained attention in medical education research. The Jefferson Scale of Empathy is the most commonly used measure of empathy worldwide, and to date it has been translated in 39 languages. This study aimed to adapt the Jefferson Scale of Empathy to the Brazilian culture and to test its reliability and validity among Brazilian medical students.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The Portuguese version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy was adapted to Brazil using back-translation techniques. This version was pretested among 39 fifth-year medical students in September 2010. During the final fifth- and sixth-year Objective Structured Clinical Examination (October 2011), 319 students were invited to respond to the scale anonymously. Cronbach’s alpha, exploratory factor analysis, item-total correlation, and gender comparisons were performed to check the reliability and validity of the scale.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The student response rate was 93.7% (299 students). Cronbach’s coefficient for the scale was 0.84. A principal component analysis confirmed the construct validity of the scale for three main factors: Compassionate Care (first factor), Ability to Stand in the Patient’s Shoes (second factor), and Perspective Taking (third factor). Gender comparisons did not reveal differences in the scores between female and male students.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The adapted Brazilian version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy proved to be a valid, reliable instrument for use in national and cross-cultural studies in medical education.</p>
dc.language English
dc.publisher BioMed Central
dc.relation http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/12/73
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6920
dc.rights CC BY
dc.source BMC Medical Education, Vol 12, Iss 1, p 73 (2012)
dc.subject Empathy
dc.subject Students, Medical
dc.subject Psychometrics
dc.subject Medicine (General)
dc.subject R5-920
dc.subject Medicine
dc.subject R
dc.subject DOAJ:Medicine (General)
dc.subject DOAJ:Health Sciences
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Medicine (General)
dc.subject R5-920
dc.subject Medicine
dc.subject R
dc.subject DOAJ:Medicine (General)
dc.subject DOAJ:Health Sciences
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Medicine (General)
dc.subject R5-920
dc.subject Medicine
dc.subject R
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Medicine (General)
dc.subject R5-920
dc.subject Medicine
dc.subject R
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Medicine (General)
dc.subject R5-920
dc.subject Medicine
dc.subject R
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.title Brazilian version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy: psychometric properties and factor analysis
dc.type Article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account