Think! Evidence

Why education policies fail: Multiple streams model of policymaking

Show simple item record

dc.creator Teodorović Jelena
dc.date 2008-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-07-20T22:06:59Z
dc.date.available 2015-07-20T22:06:59Z
dc.identifier 10.2298/ZIPI0801022T
dc.identifier 0579-6431
dc.identifier 1820-9270
dc.identifier https://doaj.org/article/f6cab68532154e9cbf727280f0dc0034
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/10872
dc.identifier.uri https://doaj.org/article/f6cab68532154e9cbf727280f0dc0034
dc.description In this paper, the author first presents a Multiple Streams model of policymaking introduced by John Kingdon and elaborated by Robert W. Porter. The relevance and usefulness of the model are then exemplified by analyzing a reform in Argentine education. Kingdon and Porter argued that, for education policies to succeed, the following three streams of actions need to meet: problem must be clearly defined, feasible solutions offered, and political consensus obtained. In 1993, Argentina passed the Federal Law of Education in the attempt to reduce large educational inequities between the rich and the poor. The Law largely failed because (1) problems were narrowly defined only by the government, (2) solutions were one-sided, primarily focusing on the financial, and neglecting contextual and implementation problems, and (3) political will existed only at the highest level, while actual capacities of implementing units were far below those needed for the reform. Analyzing policies through the lens of the Multiple Streams model of policymaking is recommended for other policymakers.
dc.language Serbian
dc.publisher Institut za pedagoška istraživanja
dc.relation http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0579-6431/2008/0579-64310801022T.pdf
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/0579-6431
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/1820-9270
dc.source Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoška Istraživanja, Vol 40, Iss 1, Pp 22-36 (2008)
dc.subject Porter
dc.subject multiple streams model
dc.subject Argentina
dc.subject federal law of education
dc.subject education policy
dc.subject reform
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.title Why education policies fail: Multiple streams model of policymaking
dc.type Article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account