Think! Evidence

Tolerance as a Democratic Value in Higher Education

Show simple item record

dc.creator Kasım Kıroğlu
dc.creator Cevat Elma
dc.creator Alper Kesten
dc.creator Şule Egüz
dc.date 2012-11-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-07-20T22:07:36Z
dc.date.available 2015-07-20T22:07:36Z
dc.identifier 1309-9108
dc.identifier https://doaj.org/article/f3d279e0c60b42b98d8b63098699bb0c
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/11332
dc.identifier.uri https://doaj.org/article/f3d279e0c60b42b98d8b63098699bb0c
dc.description When we think about democracy, what springs to mind are values such as solidarity, tolerance, responsibility, love, respect, helpfulness, honesty, justice, freedom, compromise, and equality. There is no way that any one of these values could be preferred over another. However, tolerance has a special place in nurturing democracy. The Turkish for tolerance is hoşgörü and the Arabic and the Ottoman-Turkish is müsamaha. It is the state of not being bothered by others’ differences in way of language, religion, gender, creed, and attitudes, and being patient with those holding views and expressing feelings that may be in conflict with our own. A tolerant person is one who accepts there may be various approaches to a given issue, who tries to see these various approaches, and who views other people’s approaches from this perspective. A new generation that has internalized democracy is only possible through democratic classroom settings at all levels of education and especially in institutions of higher education where the lecturers train the future teachers in a tolerant environment and encourage them to adopt similar attitudes and behaviours. In this sense, lecturers’ attitudes towards students in the education process are important for nurturing democratic understanding and improving tolerance. However, how an individual defines themselves does not matter so much as how others define them. It is therefore not sufficient for lecturers just to define themselves as tolerant. In order for them to be so considered by their students, their tolerant classroom environment must be at least partially in line with their fellow lecturers’ and students’ expectations. An original dimension of this study was the development of a scale by first asking students’ ideas of how a tolerant lecturer should be, which is expected to make a contribution to the field. The main objective of this study is to find out the views on in-class tolerance of lecturers working at schools of education.
dc.language Turkish
dc.language English
dc.publisher Association for Social Studies Educators (ASSE)
dc.relation http://jsser.org/index.php/JSSER/article/viewFile/129/pdf
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/1309-9108
dc.source Journal of Social Studies Education Research, Vol 3, Iss 2, Pp 86-104 (2012)
dc.subject Democratic value
dc.subject tolerance
dc.subject academician
dc.subject university student
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.title Tolerance as a Democratic Value in Higher Education
dc.type Article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account