On the necessity for a third generation in mixed method design, theory, and research: overcoming the burden of the incompatibility thesis between qualitative and quantitative research

dc.creator	Manfred Max Bergman
dc.date	2011-12-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned	2015-07-20T22:07:54Z
dc.date.available	2015-07-20T22:07:54Z
dc.identifier	1211-4669
dc.identifier	https://doaj.org/article/f2331deb9af140278d7e3e21679495fb
dc.identifier.uri	http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/11587
dc.identifier.uri	https://doaj.org/article/f2331deb9af140278d7e3e21679495fb
dc.description	In this paper I strive for overcoming the burden of the incompatibility thesisbetween qualitative and quantitative research a I call for a third generation in mixedmethod design, theory, and research. I will, first, outline the presumed differencesbetween QL and QN methods; second, review briefly how mixed methods researchershave attempted to deal with these differences; third, critically assess and subsequentlyreject the tenability of these differences; and, fourth, propose steps toward a thirdgeneration of mixed methods literature and practices. Ultimately, I will argue that contemporarymixed methods design, research, and theory currently lack a good groundingand that an alternative grounding will not only improve the justification for mixedmethods research, but it will also broaden its scope and improve its practice.
dc.language	Czech
dc.language	Slovak
dc.publisher	Czech Pedagogical Society
dc.relation	http://www.ped.muni.cz/pedor/archiv/2011/PedOr11_4_ONezbytnosti3Generace_Bergman.pdf
dc.relation	https://doaj.org/toc/1211-4669
dc.rights	CC BY-NC-ND
dc.source	Pedagogicka Orientace, Vol 21, Iss 4, Pp 457-473 (2011)
dc.subject	ontology
dc.subject	epistemology
dc.subject	incompatibility thesis
dc.subject	qualitative research
dc.subject	quantitative research
dc.subject	mixed methods research
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	DOAJ:Education
dc.subject	DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	DOAJ:Education
dc.subject	DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.title	On the necessity for a third generation in mixed method design, theory, and research: overcoming the burden of the incompatibility thesis between qualitative and quantitative research
dc.type	Article