| dc.creator |
Leo M. Harvill, PhD |
|
| dc.creator |
Forrest Lang, MD |
|
| dc.creator |
Ronald S. McCord, MD |
|
| dc.date |
2004-01-01T00:00:00Z |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2015-07-20T22:08:36Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2015-07-20T22:08:36Z |
|
| dc.identifier |
1087-2981 |
|
| dc.identifier |
https://doaj.org/article/eebd7329758c4a60bceb9c5edeba30f1 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/12148 |
|
| dc.description |
Abstract Objectives: Tools are needed for determining appropriate weights for complex performance assessment components in medical education. The feasibility of using judgmental policy capturing (JPC), a procedure to statistically describe the information processing strategies of experts, for this purpose was investigated. Methods: Iterative JPC was used to determine appropriate weighting for the six core communication skill scores from a communications objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for medical students using a panel of four communication skill experts. Results: The mean regression weights from the panel indicated they placed less importance on information management (8.5%), moderate and nearly equal importance on rapport building (15.8%), agenda setting (15.4%), and addressing feelings (14.1%), and greater importance on active listening (20.1%) and reaching common ground with the patient (25.5%). Discussion: JPC is an effective procedure for determining appropriate weights for complex clinical assessment components. The derived weights may be very different for those assessment components |
|
| dc.language |
English |
|
| dc.publisher |
Medical Education Online |
|
| dc.relation |
http://www.med-ed-online.org/pdf/Res00092.pdf |
|
| dc.relation |
https://doaj.org/toc/1087-2981 |
|
| dc.rights |
CC BY |
|
| dc.source |
Medical Education Online, Vol 9 (2004) |
|
| dc.subject |
judgmental policy capturing |
|
| dc.subject |
component weighting |
|
| dc.subject |
physician-patient communication |
|
| dc.subject |
objective structured clinical examination |
|
| dc.subject |
Special aspects of education |
|
| dc.subject |
LC8-6691 |
|
| dc.subject |
Education |
|
| dc.subject |
L |
|
| dc.subject |
DOAJ:Education |
|
| dc.subject |
DOAJ:Social Sciences |
|
| dc.subject |
Medicine (General) |
|
| dc.subject |
R5-920 |
|
| dc.subject |
Medicine |
|
| dc.subject |
R |
|
| dc.subject |
DOAJ:Medicine (General) |
|
| dc.subject |
DOAJ:Health Sciences |
|
| dc.subject |
Special aspects of education |
|
| dc.subject |
LC8-6691 |
|
| dc.subject |
Education |
|
| dc.subject |
L |
|
| dc.subject |
DOAJ:Education |
|
| dc.subject |
DOAJ:Social Sciences |
|
| dc.subject |
Medicine (General) |
|
| dc.subject |
R5-920 |
|
| dc.subject |
Medicine |
|
| dc.subject |
R |
|
| dc.subject |
DOAJ:Medicine (General) |
|
| dc.subject |
DOAJ:Health Sciences |
|
| dc.subject |
Special aspects of education |
|
| dc.subject |
LC8-6691 |
|
| dc.subject |
Education |
|
| dc.subject |
L |
|
| dc.subject |
Medicine (General) |
|
| dc.subject |
R5-920 |
|
| dc.subject |
Medicine |
|
| dc.subject |
R |
|
| dc.subject |
Special aspects of education |
|
| dc.subject |
LC8-6691 |
|
| dc.subject |
Education |
|
| dc.subject |
L |
|
| dc.subject |
Medicine (General) |
|
| dc.subject |
R5-920 |
|
| dc.subject |
Medicine |
|
| dc.subject |
R |
|
| dc.subject |
Special aspects of education |
|
| dc.subject |
LC8-6691 |
|
| dc.subject |
Education |
|
| dc.subject |
L |
|
| dc.subject |
Medicine (General) |
|
| dc.subject |
R5-920 |
|
| dc.subject |
Medicine |
|
| dc.subject |
R |
|
| dc.title |
Determining Component Weights in a Communications Assessment Using Judgmental Policy Capturing |
|
| dc.type |
article |
|