Think! Evidence

School Guidance and Discipline: teachers’ and students’ construction of classroom knowledge in two Hong Kong secondary schools

Show simple item record

dc.creator Ming-Tak Hue
dc.date 2006-04-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-07-20T22:09:26Z
dc.date.available 2015-07-20T22:09:26Z
dc.identifier 1477-5557
dc.identifier https://doaj.org/article/ea7b728aef3646dbb5c84a896484b0bf
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/12787
dc.description Most Hong Kong secondary schools have two teams of guidance and discipline teachers to manage students’ misbehaviour. The guidance team is mainly responsible for providing a personal counselling service and for carrying out guidance programmes, such as sex education. The discipline team works with students who have been identified as having behavioural problems. They are also responsible for enforcing discipline policy, such as the wearing of school uniform. Most teachers and school managers are concerned with the difficulty of integrating guidance and discipline into schooling. Many studies have shown that guidance teachers are described as ‘soft’ whereas discipline teachers as described as ‘strict’ and ‘tough’. Each team of teachers has a contrasting rationale as to how best to help students resolve their difficulties. However, no research has yet been completed into how guidance and discipline are implemented in the classroom. This article focuses on this area and reports a study of what classroom knowledge teachers and students construct, with respect to the relationship between guidance and discipline. The qualitative methods for data collection are described and two case studies are presented. The analysis shows that such a relationship differs from school to school, and that teachers’ construct of classroom knowledge of guidance and discipline is closely linked to the features of school organisation of the schools to which these teachers belong. Finally, the paper looks at the implication of this study in drawing school managers’ and policy makers’ attention to the impact of school organisation on guidance and discipline in the classroom.
dc.language English
dc.publisher Institute of Education, University of London
dc.relation http://www.educatejournal.org/index.php?journal=educate&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=9
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/1477-5557
dc.source Educate~, Vol 2, Iss 1, Pp 23-35 (2006)
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.title School Guidance and Discipline: teachers’ and students’ construction of classroom knowledge in two Hong Kong secondary schools
dc.type article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account