Think! Evidence

Evaluation in a project life-cycle: the hypermedia CAMILLE project

Show simple item record

dc.creator Thierry Chanier
dc.date 1996-12-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-07-20T22:10:35Z
dc.date.available 2015-07-20T22:10:35Z
dc.identifier 10.3402/rlt.v4i3.9979
dc.identifier 2156-7069
dc.identifier 2156-7077
dc.identifier https://doaj.org/article/e451b9ee8155427b926ae97d2f57d381
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/13747
dc.description This paper reports on a series of evaluations undertaken in the countries which participated in the CAMILLE project.1 The principal aim of this European project has been the development and delivery of hypermedia courseware in Dutch, Spanish and French. The courseware encompasses the training of general linguistic competencies for beginners (Dutch and Spanish) as well as competencies related to the use of language for specific purposes (French). The target audience includes students in science or business, and technicians or engineers from SMEs (Small and Medium Enterprises - small businesses). This report may be of interest to two kinds of reader of this journal, as follows. • Each one of our packages exploit the full range of hypertextual and multimedia facilities currently provided by standard computing platforms. Furthermore, each package offers learners a large-scale learning environment capable of supporting autonomous study. Consequently, these preliminary outcomes relating to the way CAMILLE has been practically used by learners and to its effectiveness are of potential interest to teachers, trainers and educational advisers. • The various experiments conducted by the teams and integrated into the process of software development will be of interest to Computer-Aided Learning (CAL) developers in general. Indeed, within the CAL literature, the issue of integrating evaluation into the life of a project, i.e. either in the course of the development or at the end of it, has often been recommended but much less frequently reported, at least for this type of environment. The paper discusses the constraints, advantages and drawbacks of actually adopting such a procedure.
dc.language English
dc.relation http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/9979
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/2156-7069
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/2156-7077
dc.rights CC BY
dc.source Research in Learning Technology, Vol 4, Iss 3 (1996)
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.title Evaluation in a project life-cycle: the hypermedia CAMILLE project
dc.type article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account