Concordâncias e discordâncias de Dewey com Freud Dewey's agreements and disagreements with Freud

dc.creator	Erika Natacha Fernandes de Andrade
dc.creator	Marcus Vinicius da Cunha
dc.date	2012-06-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned	2015-07-20T22:10:41Z
dc.date.available	2015-07-20T22:10:41Z
dc.identifier	10.1590/S0104-40602012000200017
dc.identifier	0104-4060
dc.identifier	https://doaj.org/article/e38ed22351054ae6a6d34900918f5305
dc.identifier.uri	http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/13830
dc.description	Este artigo expõe ideias de Sigmund Freud sobre temas que são fundamentais para compreender o homem contemporâneo: a constituição do psiquismo; a formação e a resolução das patologias mentais; a cultura em sentido amplo e a educação como elemento mediador entre o indivíduo e a sociedade. O objetivo é apresentar e comparar as análises feitas por John Dewey sobre esses mesmos temas, tomando por base o livro Human nature and conduct. As comparações entre os discursos freudiano e deweyano são feitas por meio da metodologia proposta por Chaïm Perelman no livro Tratado da argumentação (elaborado em coautoria com Olbrechts-Tyteca), que busca esclarecer as estratégias argumentativas usadas por um autor para obter ou aumentar a adesão às teses propostas e, com isso, despertar ações concretas. As conclusões sugerem que, embora Dewey discorde de Freud, existem pontos de concordância entre ambos, especialmente no que diz respeito ao significado dos impulsos e da sublimação e à concepção de que o conhecimento é mutável e impreciso, o que rejeita a crença em certezas absolutas e insere as decisões e ações humanas no âmbito da probabilidade.<br>This article exposes Sigmund Freud's ideas about themes which are fundamental to the comprehension of the contemporary man: the psychic constitution; the formation and resolution of mental pathologies; the broad meaning of culture and the education as a mediating element between individual and society. This paper aims to present and compare the analysis made by John Dewey regarding these same themes based on the book Human nature and conduct. The comparisons between Freudian and Deweyan discourses are made through the methodology proposed by Chaïm Perelman in the book Treatise on argumentation (co-authored by Olbrechts-Tyteca), which aims to clarify the argumentative strategies used by an author to obtain or increase adhesion to the proposed theses and, with that, to awaken concrete actions. The conclusions suggest that although Dewey disagrees with Freud, they agree on certain issues, especially regarding the meaning of impulses and sublimation and regarding the conception that knowledge is changeable and imprecise, what rejects the belief in absolute certainties and inserts human actions and decisions in the sphere of probability.
dc.language	Portuguese
dc.publisher	Setor de Educação da Universidade Federal do Paraná
dc.relation	http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-40602012000200017
dc.relation	https://doaj.org/toc/0104-4060
dc.rights	CC BY-NC
dc.source	Educar em Revista, Iss 44, Pp 275-291 (2012)
dc.subject	John Dewey
dc.subject	Sigmund Freud
dc.subject	discurso psicológico
dc.subject	educação
dc.subject	retórica
dc.subject	John Dewey
dc.subject	Sigmund Freud
dc.subject	psychological discourse
dc.subject	education
dc.subject	rhetoric
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	DOAJ:Education
dc.subject	DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	DOAJ:Education
dc.subject	DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.title	Concordâncias e discordâncias de Dewey com Freud Dewey's agreements and disagreements with Freud
dc.type	article