The world-system of academic capitalism: Process of consolidation of the entrepeneurial university Las Encuestas de Opinión en la Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez: ¿Un Caso de Exclusión del Profesorado?

dc.creator	César Silva Montes
dc.date	2009-12-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned	2015-07-20T22:10:53Z
dc.date.available	2015-07-20T22:10:53Z
dc.identifier	1068-2341
dc.identifier	https://doaj.org/article/e28f091790d34bc8b64ec8b1ea7eb158
dc.identifier.uri	http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/13988
dc.description	<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: medium; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;">This article presents an analysis of the system of the faculty evaluation by their students at the Universidad Autonoma de Ciudad Juarez (UACJ). The study was conducted following an interpretative and ethnographic methodology; empirical data was obtained based on participative observation. My presence on a daily basis allows me to register the processes in detail. In this methodology, the subjectivity, ideology and political stand of the researcher are made explicit. Results from the study indicate that for the perspective of the university administration, the faculty evaluation validates the teaching quality, and it is a referent to justify the professor exclusion from the university's incentive program. The faculty views the student evaluation as a control of their labor and as a revenge mechanism from those students who felt that will fail the course. The student perceives the evaluation as a mandatory and unimportant task, because its results do not modify the faculty pedagogic practice. Although there is an agreement between the administration and the faculty to maintain the student evaluation process for merit incentive purpose, faculty questions if this type of evaluation is appropriate for all the disciplines; the validity of peer evaluations; and, the student's judgment to leave them without labor economic incentives. As a result of the found divergence, it is proposed a dialogue among the professors; University's administration, and the students to generate an opinion poll in agreement to the context.</span> <span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: medium; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;">En el presente art&iacute;culo se analiza la encuesta de opini&oacute;n que realiza el alumnado de la Universidad Aut&oacute;noma de Ciudad Ju&aacute;rez (UACJ) para evaluar la docencia. Desde una metodolog&iacute;a interpretativa y etnogr&aacute;fica, basada en la observaci&oacute;n participante, se recopilaron los datos emp&iacute;ricos. Mi presencia permanente en la din&aacute;mica cotidiana, permiti&oacute; registrar con detalle la aplicaci&oacute;n de la encuesta. En esta metodolog&iacute;a, la subjetividad, la postura pol&iacute;tica e ideol&oacute;gica del investigador son expl&iacute;citas. Los hallazgos del estudio se&ntilde;alan que para la administraci&oacute;n de la UACJ la encuesta es un aval de la calidad de la ense&ntilde;anza y un referente para excluir al profesorado del programa de incentivos econ&oacute;micos. Seg&uacute;n, el profesorado es una forma de control de su labor y de venganza del alumnado por la insatisfacci&oacute;n de la calificaci&oacute;n obtenida. El estudiantado la concibe como una tarea obligatoria e intrascendente pues el profesorado no modifica su pr&aacute;ctica pedag&oacute;gica. Aunque existe acuerdo entre administraci&oacute;n y profesorado de mantener la puntuaci&oacute;n para recibir est&iacute;mulos econ&oacute;micos, el &uacute;ltimo cuestiona s&iacute; los rubros de la encuesta aplican en todas las disciplinas, la necesidad de evaluar entre pares y el peso del estudiantado para dejarlos sin remuneraciones extras. Derivado de las divergencias encontradas, se plantea un di&aacute;logo entre profesorado y estudiantado con la administraci&oacute;n para elaborar una encuesta de acuerdo al contexto de la instituci&oacute;n.</span>
dc.language	English
dc.language	Spanish
dc.language	Portuguese
dc.publisher	Arizona State University
dc.relation	http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/391
dc.relation	https://doaj.org/toc/1068-2341
dc.rights	CC BY
dc.source	Education Policy Analysis Archives, Vol 17, p 24 (2009)
dc.subject	opinion poll, evaluation, education, standardization, and dialog
dc.subject	Special aspects of education
dc.subject	LC8-6691
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	DOAJ:Education
dc.subject	DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject	Special aspects of education
dc.subject	LC8-6691
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	DOAJ:Education
dc.subject	DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject	Special aspects of education
dc.subject	LC8-6691
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	Special aspects of education
dc.subject	LC8-6691
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	Special aspects of education
dc.subject	LC8-6691
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.title	The world-system of academic capitalism: Process of consolidation of the entrepeneurial university Las Encuestas de Opinión en la Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez: ¿Un Caso de Exclusión del Profesorado?
dc.type	article