INSTITUTE DEFERRAL IN CRIMINAL, EXECUTION OF CRIMINAL AND THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

dc.creator	Sayadyan Susanna Grigorevna
dc.date	2012-11-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned	2015-07-20T22:11:09Z
dc.date.available	2015-07-20T22:11:09Z
dc.identifier	2077-1770
dc.identifier	2218-7405
dc.identifier	https://doaj.org/article/e164bab9edad4c37bec6f95f0cacb30f
dc.identifier.uri	http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/14188
dc.description	This article is devoted to the institution of a delay in the norms of the criminal, criminal procedure and the Criminal Executive laws. Branch manifold delay is due to its ability to flexibly and pragmatically consider features arisen life situations that allows to optimize the execution process of any decision. At present the Institute of deferral is actively used as a tool of individualization and differentiation of responsibility, and the means of the humanization of punishment. A major finding in the present article is the proposition that deferral of service of sentence is interdisciplinary institution through which to solve important problems (personal problems, deliverance from suffering newborns or young children, enabling the primary socialization of young children). Comparative analysis of the norms of these branches of law allowed to reveal some contradictions and gaps. The article suggests to extend the ban of destination correctional, compulsory or forced labor for prisoners - men, which are the only parents of children under the age of 3 years. The article draws attention to the branch peculiarities of regulation of deferral. In the criminal law directly provides for such the deferral species as the deferral of service of sentence pregnant women and convicted with small children and to delay sentence drug addicts. In the article sums up point of view about that the provision under Part 4 of Art. 81 of the Criminal Code, on temporary exemption from punishment due to illness until recovery convicted by its content virtually is also a deferral of service of sentence.
dc.language	Russian
dc.publisher	Naučno-innovacionnyj Centr
dc.relation	https://doaj.org/toc/2077-1770
dc.relation	https://doaj.org/toc/2218-7405
dc.rights	CC BY-NC-ND
dc.source	Sovremennye Issledovaniâ Socialʹnyh Problem , Iss 11 (2012)
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	DOAJ:Education
dc.subject	DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	DOAJ:Education
dc.subject	DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.title	INSTITUTE DEFERRAL IN CRIMINAL, EXECUTION OF CRIMINAL AND THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
dc.type	article