Think! Evidence

An analysis of the alignment of the grade 12 physical sciences examination and the core curriculum in South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.creator Nazeem Edwards
dc.date 2010-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-07-20T22:11:52Z
dc.date.available 2015-07-20T22:11:52Z
dc.identifier 0256-0100
dc.identifier 2076-3433
dc.identifier https://doaj.org/article/ddfe3669b5bb464f9cff53a59921f41b
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/14771
dc.description I report on an analysis of the alignment between the South African Grade 12 Physical Sciences core curriculum content and the exemplar papers of 2008, and the final examination papers of 2008 and 2009. A two-dimensional table was used for both the curriculum and the examination in order to calculate the Porter alignment index, which indicates the degree of match between the two. Alignment indices of 0.8 and 0.6 for Physics and Chemistry, respectively, were computed and remained constant for Physics, but fluctuated initially for Chemistry before levelling off. Using the revised Bloom's taxonomy, discrepancies were found in terms of cognitive levels as well as content areas in both Physics and Chemistry. The cognitive level Remember is under-represented in the Chemistry and Physics examinations, whereas the cognitive levels Understand and Apply were over-represented in Chemistry. It is argued that the shift to higher cognitive levels is in line with the reported increase in cognitive complexity of the Physical Sciences curriculum. The significance of the study for Physical Science teachers is highlighted, and the potential for further research is also indicated.
dc.language English
dc.publisher Education Association of South Africa (EASA)
dc.relation http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0256-01002010000400005
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/0256-0100
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3433
dc.source South African Journal of Education, Vol 30, Iss 4, Pp 571-590 (2010)
dc.subject alignment
dc.subject assessment
dc.subject Chemistry
dc.subject cognitive level
dc.subject curriculum content
dc.subject Physics
dc.subject revised Bloom's taxonomy
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.title An analysis of the alignment of the grade 12 physical sciences examination and the core curriculum in South Africa
dc.type article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account