Think! Evidence

Foreign Language Teachers’ Attitude toward Authentic Assessment in Language Teaching

Show simple item record

dc.creator Bengü Aksu Ataç
dc.date 2012-10-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-07-20T22:12:58Z
dc.date.available 2015-07-20T22:12:58Z
dc.identifier 1305-578X
dc.identifier https://doaj.org/article/d868ae456ea04eaf856e7531e1209d3d
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/15657
dc.description Problem Statement: A rapidly increasing interest has been observed in finding alternatives to traditional forms of assessment in education. For at least three decades, teachers, curriculum developers and program administrators have been studying hard to identify appropriate procedures to assess the knowledge and abilities of students. The term “authentic assessment” has emerged from this need in the field of education, and can be described as “the multiple forms of assessment that reflect student learning, achievement, motivation, and attitudes on instructionally-relevant classroom activities” (O’Malley and Valdez Pierce, 1996, p. 4). Given that the topic is a relatively new and challenging one, it has been observed that to examine language teachers’ perceptions and attitude toward authentic assessment is quite important.Purpose of Study: In this study, a questionnaire which aims to determine the ideas and opinions of English language instructors regarding the use of authentic assessment has been applied and the results of the study have been presented and discussed.Method: In order to find answers to the research question “What are the language teaching instructors’ ideas and attitude toward authentic assessment in language teaching classes?”, a questionnaire which is called “Authentic Assessment Inventory for Goal Setting”(O’Malley and Valdez; 1992) has been used in this study. This inventory has been applied to 37randomly-selected instructors from Atilim University Preparatory School of English. Theinventory consists of 15 questions that can be answered with three alternatives, mainly, 1 =not at all, 2 = somewhat, 3 = a great deal.Findings: Answers to the questions in the inventory where handled under two maincategories: at what point the instructors are now, and where they wish to be concerning the issue of authentic assessment.Conclusion and Recommendations: As a concluding remark for the study, it will bepedagogically useful to attach more importance to authentic assessment in curriculum andeducational programs of language teaching. Additionally, it is recommended that morescientific research be conducted about authentic assessment, in particular on goal-setting,educational planning and program development.
dc.language English
dc.language Turkish
dc.publisher Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
dc.relation http://www.jlls.org/vol8no2/7-19.pdf
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/1305-578X
dc.source Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, Vol 8, Iss 2, Pp 7-19 (2012)
dc.subject authentic assessment
dc.subject traditional assessment
dc.subject language teaching
dc.subject testing and assessment.
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.title Foreign Language Teachers’ Attitude toward Authentic Assessment in Language Teaching
dc.type article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account