Think! Evidence

Task Difficulty, Self-Handicapping and Performance: A Study of Implicit Theories of Ability

Show simple item record

dc.creator Vali Khalkhali
dc.date 2012-12-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-07-20T22:13:01Z
dc.date.available 2015-07-20T22:13:01Z
dc.identifier 1309-2707
dc.identifier https://doaj.org/article/d8270219735e4103bb962173f15de713
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/15699
dc.description Self-theories, or the theories people hold about their own qualities such as abilities, have important consequences for motivation and behavior. Examining self-theories could help us to understand how ability beliefs affect student performance and self-handicapping. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of self-theories about ability and task difficulty on student performance and use of self-handicapping strategies in sport competitions. In this study, a blocked factorial design was conducted. The subjects were 30 entity and 30 incremental theorists Iranian male students who were divided into four equal sized groups. The first and third groups participated in a 540m track event with a 180-second time limit. The second and forth groups participated in a similar race with a 120-second time limit. After racing, all subjects completed a self-handicapping questionnaire and their performance also was recorded. MANOVA analyses of the resulting data showed incremental students reported fewer self-handicapping strategies for their next race as well as better performance compared with entity participants. These findings were, however, evident in the second competition. Moreover, subjects who participated in the first race, regardless of ability beliefs, did not show significant difference between self-handicapping strategies and performance. The findings highlight that ability beliefs can affect the students’ performance and degree of effort; this emerges when fail probability is high.© 2012 IOJES. All rights reserved
dc.language Turkish
dc.language English
dc.publisher IOJES
dc.relation http://www.iojes.net//userfiles/Article/IOJES_956.pdf
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/1309-2707
dc.source International Online Journal of Educational Sciences , Vol 4, Iss 3, Pp 592-601 (2012)
dc.subject Self-theories
dc.subject task difficulty
dc.subject performance
dc.subject self-handicapping
dc.subject sport
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.title Task Difficulty, Self-Handicapping and Performance: A Study of Implicit Theories of Ability
dc.type article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account