Think! Evidence

Teaching creative thinking in regular science lessons: Potentials and obstacles of three different approaches in an Asian context

Show simple item record

dc.creator Vivian M. Y. CHENG
dc.date 2010-06-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-07-20T22:13:55Z
dc.date.available 2015-07-20T22:13:55Z
dc.identifier 1609-4913
dc.identifier https://doaj.org/article/d3bbf392aaff48fca5d7b6d5db227817
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/16416
dc.description In response to the recent school creativity reforms in Asian places, this paper studied three different approaches of integrating creative thinking training into regular science lessons. They include developing creative thinking through science process, science content and science scenario. Three teacher case studies were conducted to examine the potentials and obstacles of implementing these approaches in classroom of Hong Kong. This study found that all the approaches were useful in developing student creative thinking, yet teachers experienced different tensions and dilemmas in different approaches. This paper suggests that the science content approach may be more readily accepted by teachers and students in an educational system which is dominated by knowledge content and examinations. However, with the limited skills and experience in creativity, teachers and students may feel that the science process and science scenario approach are easier to start with, as they are less constrained by the rigid content in the syllabus. Among various hindering factors, the most crucial one was found to be the original heavy knowledge-content, which in fact is a common characteristic of secondary science curriculum in many Asian places. In our future research and educational reforms, the dilemma between creative thinking and content learning needs to be seriously considered and solved at both individual and system levels.
dc.language English
dc.language Chinese
dc.publisher Hong Kong Institute of Education
dc.relation http://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/v11_issue1/chengmy/
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/1609-4913
dc.source Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Vol 11, Iss 1, p 17 (2010)
dc.subject creativity education
dc.subject science curriculum
dc.subject Asian context
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.title Teaching creative thinking in regular science lessons: Potentials and obstacles of three different approaches in an Asian context
dc.type article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account