Think! Evidence

Teachers’ intuition and knowledge in detecting specific learning disabilities

Show simple item record

dc.creator Obradović Svetlana
dc.creator Krstić Nadežda
dc.date 2012-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-07-20T22:14:31Z
dc.date.available 2015-07-20T22:14:31Z
dc.identifier 10.2298/ZIPI1202316O
dc.identifier 0579-6431
dc.identifier 1820-9270
dc.identifier https://doaj.org/article/d06f0712997a411cbec54124a0ae1e9c
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/16925
dc.description The aim of the study was to investigate primary school teachers’ proficiency in detecting the ability-achievement discrepancy as a landmark of possible specific developmental learning disabilities (SLD). Twenty-two teachers in five schools attempted to select, in accordance with their perception and out of a larger preliminary sample, those students whose school results revealed: (a) discrepancy between school achievement and general abilities (the group of purportedly disharmonic children, GPD) or (b) concordance between general abilities and achievement (the group of purportedly harmonic children, GPH). The children were tested by REVISK, while teachers re-assessed students’ reading, writing and arithmetic performance against a simple structured questionnaire based on demands of the approved elementary school program delineated by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Serbia. Research results indicate that more than 60% of children originally qualified to GPH have actually shown significant discrepancy between targeted scholastic skills and (normal) general intelligence. The data suggested some association between students’ disparity in attainment and teachers’ attribution accuracy, while the only homogenous quantitative marker of misplaced children were decreased values on some of the REVISK Verbal subscale tests. This study has shown that teachers can use their professional knowledge to enhance their capability to detect children with specific learning disabilities. In absence of criterion-referenced tests of reading, writing and mathematics, a structured approach to the projected course of skill progress might support teachers’ confidence regarding likely SLD.
dc.language Serbian
dc.publisher Institut za pedagoška istraživanja
dc.relation http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0579-6431/2012/0579-64311202316O.pdf
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/0579-6431
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/1820-9270
dc.source Zbornik Instituta za Pedagoška Istraživanja, Vol 44, Iss 2, Pp 316-331 (2012)
dc.subject specific developmental learning disabilities
dc.subject teachers’ perception
dc.subject IQ
dc.subject methodological issues
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.title Teachers’ intuition and knowledge in detecting specific learning disabilities
dc.type article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account