Think! Evidence

Agenda pós-moderna e neopositivismo: antípodas solidários Postmodern agenda and neopositivism: connected antipodes

Show simple item record

dc.creator Sandra Soares Della Fonte
dc.date 2010-03-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-07-20T22:14:43Z
dc.date.available 2015-07-20T22:14:43Z
dc.identifier 10.1590/S0101-73302010000100003
dc.identifier 0101-7330
dc.identifier 1678-4626
dc.identifier https://doaj.org/article/cf836210fedf455a960bfdbf1aceaffe
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/17066
dc.description Este artigo toma como foco duas questões norteadoras: qual o lugar que o pós-estruturalismo e o neopragmatismo ocupam na produção do conhecimento referente aos estudos do currículo? Quais os desdobramentos éticos, políticos e filosóficos dessas orientações teóricas para o campo educacional em geral? Ao tratar dessas indagações, o texto coloca em xeque crenças subscritas quanto a essas duas perspectivas teóricas no campo de estudos do currículo, quais sejam: o pós-estruturalismo e o neopragmatismo colaboraram para a oposição à tradição positivista; fortaleceram a noção de convivência democrática pela defesa da pluralidade e da diferença; enriqueceram a produção do conhecimento acadêmico da educação e a criação de práticas inovadoras de viver o currículo.<br>This paper focuses on two questions: what is the place of post-structuralism and neopragmatism in the production of knowledge on curriculum studies? What are their ethical, political and philosophical consequences for the educational field in general? When dealing with these issues, the text brings into question some beliefs about these two theoretical trends, such as: they contribute to oppose the Positivist tradition; they strengthen the notion of democratic coexistence by defending plurality and difference; finally, they enrich the production of academic knowledge in education and the creation of innovative practices for experiencing the curriculum.
dc.language Portuguese
dc.language Spanish
dc.language English
dc.publisher Centro de Estudos Educação e Sociedade - Cedes
dc.relation http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-73302010000100003
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/0101-7330
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/1678-4626
dc.rights CC BY-NC
dc.source Educação & Sociedade, Vol 31, Iss 110, Pp 35-56 (2010)
dc.subject Pesquisa educacional
dc.subject Currículo
dc.subject Pós-moderno
dc.subject Neopositivismo
dc.subject Ontologia
dc.subject Education research
dc.subject Curriculum
dc.subject Post-modern
dc.subject Neopositivism
dc.subject Ontology
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.title Agenda pós-moderna e neopositivismo: antípodas solidários Postmodern agenda and neopositivism: connected antipodes
dc.type article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account