Think! Evidence

Excellent emergency medicine educators adapt teaching methods to learner experience level and patient acuity

Show simple item record

dc.creator Kristi H. Grall
dc.creator Ilene B. Harris
dc.creator Deborah Simpson
dc.creator Mark Gelula
dc.creator Jaime Butler
dc.creator Edward P. Callahan
dc.date 2013-05-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-07-20T22:17:45Z
dc.date.available 2015-07-20T22:17:45Z
dc.identifier 10.5116/ijme.5184.d71f
dc.identifier 2042-6372
dc.identifier https://doaj.org/article/c2474f8acd6c4a8bb1406cfc672528a9
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/19140
dc.description Objectives: This study investigates whether instructional methods used by excellent emergency medicine residency teachers change with changing conditions of learner level of training, patient acuity and department census. Methods: Four excellent, purposively selected, emergency medicine teachers consented to participate in this non-participant observational study. Teachers were observed for 32 hours in the emergency department, using a structured observation form focused on: teaching methods used, context learner level of training, emergency department patient census and patients' illness severity. Data was analyzed qualitatively using constant comparative analysis. Results: Fifteen (15) categories of teaching methods were observed. The 4 most frequently observed methods were: Questioning (used in 47of teaching encounters), Advice Giving (33, Limited Teaching Points (31 and Patient Updates (22. Patient Updates were more often used with senior residents. Multiple methods were used in most encounters. Teaching methods did not vary significantly with increased emergency department volume, but faculty and residents relied more heavily on a single method of teaching per encounter as patient acuity increased to Triage levels One and Two. Conclusions: Excellent emergency medicine teachers teaching methods were classified into 15 categories. They typically rely heavily on four methods, adapting to resident training level and patient illness severity, rather than patient volume. The observed teaching methods provide teachers who have high clinical productivity expectations and/or demanding emergency care settings with an enriched repertoire of teaching strategies.
dc.language English
dc.publisher IJME
dc.relation http://www.ijme.net/archive/4/emergency-medicine-teaching-methods.pdf
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/2042-6372
dc.rights CC BY
dc.source International Journal of Medical Education, Vol 4, Pp 101-106 (2013)
dc.subject graduate medical education
dc.subject clinical teaching
dc.subject emergency medicine
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.title Excellent emergency medicine educators adapt teaching methods to learner experience level and patient acuity
dc.type article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account