Think! Evidence

Student perceptions of evaluation in undergraduate medical education: A qualitative study from one medical school

Show simple item record

dc.creator Schiekirka Sarah
dc.creator Reinhardt Deborah
dc.creator Heim Susanne
dc.creator Fabry Götz
dc.creator Pukrop Tobias
dc.creator Anders Sven
dc.creator Raupach Tobias
dc.date 2012-06-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-07-20T22:18:53Z
dc.date.available 2015-07-20T22:18:53Z
dc.identifier 10.1186/1472-6920-12-45
dc.identifier 1472-6920
dc.identifier https://doaj.org/article/bf70fdcc31bc408ca12c8028055e0922
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/19553
dc.description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Evaluation is an integral part of medical education. Despite a wide use of various evaluation tools, little is known about student perceptions regarding the purpose and desired consequences of evaluation. Such knowledge is important to facilitate interpretation of evaluation results. The aims of this study were to elicit student views on the purpose of evaluation, indicators of teaching quality, evaluation tools and possible consequences drawn from evaluation data.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This qualitative study involved 17 undergraduate medical students in Years 3 and 4 participating in 3 focus group interviews. Content analysis was conducted by two different researchers.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Evaluation was viewed as a means to facilitate improvements within medical education. Teaching quality was believed to be dependent on content, process, teacher and student characteristics as well as learning outcome, with an emphasis on the latter. Students preferred online evaluations over paper-and-pencil forms and suggested circulating results among all faculty and students. Students strongly favoured the allocation of rewards and incentives for good teaching to individual teachers.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>In addition to assessing structural aspects of teaching, evaluation tools need to adequately address learning outcome. The use of reliable and valid evaluation methods is a prerequisite for resource allocation to individual teachers based on evaluation results.</p>
dc.language English
dc.publisher BioMed Central
dc.relation http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/12/45
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6920
dc.rights CC BY
dc.source BMC Medical Education, Vol 12, Iss 1, p 45 (2012)
dc.subject Undergraduate medical education
dc.subject Evaluation
dc.subject Purpose
dc.subject Consequence
dc.subject Learning outcome
dc.subject Medicine (General)
dc.subject R5-920
dc.subject Medicine
dc.subject R
dc.subject DOAJ:Medicine (General)
dc.subject DOAJ:Health Sciences
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Medicine (General)
dc.subject R5-920
dc.subject Medicine
dc.subject R
dc.subject DOAJ:Medicine (General)
dc.subject DOAJ:Health Sciences
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Medicine (General)
dc.subject R5-920
dc.subject Medicine
dc.subject R
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Medicine (General)
dc.subject R5-920
dc.subject Medicine
dc.subject R
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Medicine (General)
dc.subject R5-920
dc.subject Medicine
dc.subject R
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.title Student perceptions of evaluation in undergraduate medical education: A qualitative study from one medical school
dc.type article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account