Think! Evidence

Evaluating the performance of engineering undergraduates who entered without A-level mathematics via a specialist six-week “bridging technology” programme

Show simple item record

dc.creator Loretta Newman-Ford
dc.creator Stephen Lloyd
dc.creator Stephen Thomas
dc.date 2007-12-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-07-20T22:20:50Z
dc.date.available 2015-07-20T22:20:50Z
dc.identifier 1750-0044
dc.identifier 1750-0052
dc.identifier https://doaj.org/article/bb41d9aab72f4037b9841019bddd251d
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/20207
dc.description This study reports on the progress ofundergraduate students who, duringthe summer of 2005, participated ina top-up mathematics programme atthe University of Glamorgan. BridgingTechnology with Mathematics wasdeveloped to improve the mathematicalpreparedness of prospective studentsfor the mathematical demands ofengineering in Higher Education (HE).The course was designed in responseto a serious decline in students’ masteryof basic mathematical skills and levelof preparation for mathematics-baseddegree courses.This paper evaluates whether the coursewas able to provide students withsufficient mathematical competence/understanding to successfullycomplete the mathematical elementsof their degree courses. Opinions andexperiences regarding the BridgingTechnology with Mathematics programmewere also sought from engineeringlecturers and the students themselves.Findings show that students whoentered engineering degree programmesthrough the Bridging Technology withMathematics route performed better thantheir fellow students in both mathematicaland non-mathematical moduleassessments. The programme providedthe additional benefits of improvingstudents’ mathematical competenceand confidence, academic motivation,preparedness for HE and conviction thatthey had chosen the correct course.
dc.language English
dc.publisher The Higher Education Academy Engineering Subject Centre
dc.relation http://www.engsc.ac.uk/downloads/scholarart/eejournal/2007/2-2/newman-ford_le.pdf
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/1750-0044
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/1750-0052
dc.rights CC BY-NC-ND
dc.source Engineering Education, Vol 2, Iss 2, Pp 33-43 (2007)
dc.subject engineering mathematics
dc.subject careers advice
dc.subject prospective students
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
dc.subject TA1-2040
dc.subject Technology
dc.subject T
dc.subject DOAJ:General and Civil Engineering
dc.subject DOAJ:Technology and Engineering
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
dc.subject TA1-2040
dc.subject Technology
dc.subject T
dc.subject DOAJ:General and Civil Engineering
dc.subject DOAJ:Technology and Engineering
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
dc.subject TA1-2040
dc.subject Technology
dc.subject T
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
dc.subject TA1-2040
dc.subject Technology
dc.subject T
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
dc.subject TA1-2040
dc.subject Technology
dc.subject T
dc.title Evaluating the performance of engineering undergraduates who entered without A-level mathematics via a specialist six-week “bridging technology” programme
dc.type article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account