dc.creator |
Loretta Newman-Ford |
|
dc.creator |
Stephen Lloyd |
|
dc.creator |
Stephen Thomas |
|
dc.date |
2007-12-01T00:00:00Z |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2015-07-20T22:20:50Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2015-07-20T22:20:50Z |
|
dc.identifier |
1750-0044 |
|
dc.identifier |
1750-0052 |
|
dc.identifier |
https://doaj.org/article/bb41d9aab72f4037b9841019bddd251d |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/20207 |
|
dc.description |
This study reports on the progress ofundergraduate students who, duringthe summer of 2005, participated ina top-up mathematics programme atthe University of Glamorgan. BridgingTechnology with Mathematics wasdeveloped to improve the mathematicalpreparedness of prospective studentsfor the mathematical demands ofengineering in Higher Education (HE).The course was designed in responseto a serious decline in students’ masteryof basic mathematical skills and levelof preparation for mathematics-baseddegree courses.This paper evaluates whether the coursewas able to provide students withsufficient mathematical competence/understanding to successfullycomplete the mathematical elementsof their degree courses. Opinions andexperiences regarding the BridgingTechnology with Mathematics programmewere also sought from engineeringlecturers and the students themselves.Findings show that students whoentered engineering degree programmesthrough the Bridging Technology withMathematics route performed better thantheir fellow students in both mathematicaland non-mathematical moduleassessments. The programme providedthe additional benefits of improvingstudents’ mathematical competenceand confidence, academic motivation,preparedness for HE and conviction thatthey had chosen the correct course. |
|
dc.language |
English |
|
dc.publisher |
The Higher Education Academy Engineering Subject Centre |
|
dc.relation |
http://www.engsc.ac.uk/downloads/scholarart/eejournal/2007/2-2/newman-ford_le.pdf |
|
dc.relation |
https://doaj.org/toc/1750-0044 |
|
dc.relation |
https://doaj.org/toc/1750-0052 |
|
dc.rights |
CC BY-NC-ND |
|
dc.source |
Engineering Education, Vol 2, Iss 2, Pp 33-43 (2007) |
|
dc.subject |
engineering mathematics |
|
dc.subject |
careers advice |
|
dc.subject |
prospective students |
|
dc.subject |
Education (General) |
|
dc.subject |
L7-991 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Education |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Social Sciences |
|
dc.subject |
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
|
dc.subject |
TA1-2040 |
|
dc.subject |
Technology |
|
dc.subject |
T |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:General and Civil Engineering |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Technology and Engineering |
|
dc.subject |
Education (General) |
|
dc.subject |
L7-991 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Education |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Social Sciences |
|
dc.subject |
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
|
dc.subject |
TA1-2040 |
|
dc.subject |
Technology |
|
dc.subject |
T |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:General and Civil Engineering |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Technology and Engineering |
|
dc.subject |
Education (General) |
|
dc.subject |
L7-991 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
|
dc.subject |
TA1-2040 |
|
dc.subject |
Technology |
|
dc.subject |
T |
|
dc.subject |
Education (General) |
|
dc.subject |
L7-991 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
|
dc.subject |
TA1-2040 |
|
dc.subject |
Technology |
|
dc.subject |
T |
|
dc.subject |
Education (General) |
|
dc.subject |
L7-991 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
|
dc.subject |
TA1-2040 |
|
dc.subject |
Technology |
|
dc.subject |
T |
|
dc.title |
Evaluating the performance of engineering undergraduates who entered without A-level mathematics via a specialist six-week “bridging technology” programme |
|
dc.type |
article |
|