Thinking in Science-Thinking in General?

dc.creator	Philip ADEY
dc.date	2006-12-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned	2015-07-20T22:22:59Z
dc.date.available	2015-07-20T22:22:59Z
dc.identifier	1609-4913
dc.identifier	https://doaj.org/article/b708e03814eb47ee802e555461de22e8
dc.identifier.uri	http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/20846
dc.description	In science we pay attention to some particular types of thinking, such as deductive and inductive logic, establishing causality through experimentation, analysis, and categorisation. There may be other types of thinking which we believe to be more typical of other fields such as literature (e.g. characterisation, sense of audience), art (e.g. form and composition, originality), or sport (e.g. whole-game strategies, anticipation) but which do not play such as large part in science. So can we represent thinking in different domains as completely independent of one another, as represented in figure 1?
dc.language	English
dc.language	Chinese
dc.publisher	Hong Kong Institute of Education
dc.relation	http://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/v7_issue2/foreword/index.htm
dc.relation	https://doaj.org/toc/1609-4913
dc.source	Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Vol 7, Iss 2 (2006)
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	DOAJ:Education
dc.subject	DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	DOAJ:Education
dc.subject	DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.title	Thinking in Science-Thinking in General?
dc.type	article