Analysis of Three Different Models Used to Acquire Three E-Learning Solutions at the Same University

dc.creator	Detken Scheepers
dc.creator	Dolf J.J. Jordaan
dc.creator	El-Marie Mostert
dc.date	2008-03-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned	2015-07-20T22:23:27Z
dc.date.available	2015-07-20T22:23:27Z
dc.identifier	1863-0383
dc.identifier	https://doaj.org/article/b63e5c9c5a2144cb8ac9b61b1dc12bc8
dc.identifier.uri	http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/20960
dc.description	The Universtiy of Pretoria has been using anelectronic assessment system since 1991 and a learningmanagement system (LMS) since 1998. Both systemsrequired urgent upgrading. In 2003 a further need arose inthe Faculty of Health Sciences, for an electronic portfoliosystem. The Department for Education Innovation (EI) hasthus implemented three new systems during the past threeyears: a new electronic assessment system, an upgradedLMS, and an electronic portfolio system. This paperanalyzes the advantages and challenges experienced in eachof the three different implementation models adopted.Recommendations are suggested, not as guidelines forinformation technology specialists, but rather for otherindividuals who are responsible for, or may consideracquiring, a new e-learning system.
dc.language	English
dc.publisher	International Association of Online Engineering (IAOE)
dc.relation	http://online-journals.org/i-jet/article/view/196/245
dc.relation	https://doaj.org/toc/1863-0383
dc.rights	CC BY
dc.source	International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), Vol 3, Iss 1, Pp 74-79 (2008)
dc.subject	e-learning
dc.subject	electronic assessment
dc.subject	e-portfolio
dc.subject	learning management system
dc.subject	development of systems
dc.subject	proprietary commercial system
dc.subject	home-grown custom system
dc.subject	Technology (General)
dc.subject	T1-995
dc.subject	Technology
dc.subject	T
dc.subject	DOAJ:Technology (General)
dc.subject	DOAJ:Technology and Engineering
dc.subject	Theory and practice of education
dc.subject	LB5-3640
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	DOAJ:Education
dc.subject	DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject	Technology (General)
dc.subject	T1-995
dc.subject	Technology
dc.subject	T
dc.subject	DOAJ:Technology (General)
dc.subject	DOAJ:Technology and Engineering
dc.subject	Theory and practice of education
dc.subject	LB5-3640
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	DOAJ:Education
dc.subject	DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject	Technology (General)
dc.subject	T1-995
dc.subject	Technology
dc.subject	T
dc.subject	Theory and practice of education
dc.subject	LB5-3640
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	Technology (General)
dc.subject	T1-995
dc.subject	Technology
dc.subject	T
dc.subject	Theory and practice of education
dc.subject	LB5-3640
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	Technology (General)
dc.subject	T1-995
dc.subject	Technology
dc.subject	T
dc.subject	Theory and practice of education
dc.subject	LB5-3640
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.title	Analysis of Three Different Models Used to Acquire Three E-Learning Solutions at the Same University
dc.type	article