Think! Evidence

AN EMPIRICALLY GROUNDED THEORY OF LITERARY DEVELOPMENT. Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge on literary development in upper secondary education

Show simple item record

dc.creator DICK SCHRAM
dc.creator GERT RIJLAARSDAM
dc.creator THEO WITTE
dc.date 2012-03-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-07-20T22:24:41Z
dc.date.available 2015-07-20T22:24:41Z
dc.identifier 1567-6617
dc.identifier 1573-1731
dc.identifier https://doaj.org/article/b4a2c2613b244dc1b8ae872d197b3023
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/21224
dc.description Teachers encounter immense variety in literary competence among students in their secondaryschool classrooms. Yet, little is known about how they perceive and deal with this variety. Moreover,little is known about the literary development that students undergo during their school career and thedifferent levels of development that can be identified. The aim of the present study is to design an instrumentthat can help to describe relevant differences in literary competence between students and tospecify the individual literary development process of students in upper secondary education (aged 15‐18). To tie in with teaching practice, we designed a research method by which we could explore theshared pedagogical content knowledge of a diverse group of six expert teachers. With the aid of questionnairesand panel discussions, data was collected on the following question: what does a studentwith a particular level of literary competence demonstrate with a particular literary text? The data analysisresulted in 14 indicators of literary competence which we then used to describe six successive competencelevels. These levels are validated by both developmental theory and the practice of literatureteaching
dc.language English
dc.publisher IAIMTE
dc.relation http://l1.publication-archive.com/public?fn=enter&repository=1&article=1372
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/1567-6617
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/1573-1731
dc.rights CC BY-NC-ND
dc.source L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, Vol 12, Pp 1-33 (2012)
dc.subject literary competence
dc.subject literary development
dc.subject pedagogical content knowledge
dc.subject reading levels
dc.subject text selection
dc.subject Philology. Linguistics
dc.subject P1-1091
dc.subject Language and Literature
dc.subject P
dc.subject DOAJ:Linguistics
dc.subject DOAJ:Languages and Literatures
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Philology. Linguistics
dc.subject P1-1091
dc.subject Language and Literature
dc.subject P
dc.subject DOAJ:Linguistics
dc.subject DOAJ:Languages and Literatures
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Philology. Linguistics
dc.subject P1-1091
dc.subject Language and Literature
dc.subject P
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Philology. Linguistics
dc.subject P1-1091
dc.subject Language and Literature
dc.subject P
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Philology. Linguistics
dc.subject P1-1091
dc.subject Language and Literature
dc.subject P
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.title AN EMPIRICALLY GROUNDED THEORY OF LITERARY DEVELOPMENT. Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge on literary development in upper secondary education
dc.type article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account