De industrias culturales a industrias del ocio y creativas: los límites del «campo» cultural From Cultural Industries to Entertainment and Creative Industries. The Boundaries of the Cultural Field

dc.creator	Raúl Rodríguez Ferrándiz
dc.date	2011-03-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned	2015-07-20T22:29:23Z
dc.date.available	2015-07-20T22:29:23Z
dc.identifier	10.3916/C36-2011-03-06
dc.identifier	1134-3478
dc.identifier	1988-3293
dc.identifier	https://doaj.org/article/aee4fd16c1e448e0bb7acba273f66cf1
dc.identifier.uri	http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/22134
dc.description	El artículo analiza la tendencia actual a la dilución del concepto de «industrias culturales» en fórmulas como «industrias del ocio», «del entretenimiento» o incluso «industrias creativas». Revisamos la bibliografía reciente especializada, acotamos el alcance y los solapamientos entre los términos mencionados y argumentamos que rubrican la deriva del concepto de «cultura», íntimamente asociada a nuevos espacios y tiempos de su disfrute, a mutaciones tecnológicas de los productos culturales, a cambios en la titularidad de sus proveedores, así como de los roles de autor, actor y espectador. Para entender esta mutación recurrimos a tres factores: 1) de la materialidad y textualidad fuertes, cerradas, exentas, del producto cultural clásico a la maleabilidad y convertibilidad que permiten las nuevas tecnologías, 2) de una experiencia cultural esencialmente contemplativa y reverente a una experimentación participante, en constante circulación, mancomunada y lúdica; 3) de una aspiración a la permanencia y la hondura, a una constitutiva con tingencia y superficialidad. Finalmente apuntamos implicaciones más ambiciosas, que desbordan el alcance del trabajo: ese totum revolutum que desdibuja las fronteras entre cultivarse y entretenerse, que socava la autonomía de ese disputado tercero en discordia –llamado «cultura»– entre el trabajo y el ocio (más placentero que el primero y más trascendente y esforzado que el segundo), también alcanza a borrar los límites entre ese ocio cultural y el propio trabajo (el negocio, en definitiva).<br>This article analyzes the current trend towards dilution of the concept of «cultural industries» and the increasing usage of terms such as «entertainment industries», «leisure industries» or even «creative industries». We review recent specialized literature, identify overlapping between the above terms and conclude that this change is a new turning point in the concept of culture, closely associated with new spaces and times for its enjoyment, with the technological evolution of cultural products, changes in the ownership of their suppliers as well as with the shifting roles of author, actor and spectator. To understand this change, we identify and explain three factors: 1) from the strong, closed materiality and textuality of the classic cultural product to the malleability and convertibility permitted by new technologies; 2) from an essentially contemplative, reverent cultural experience to participant experimentation and play; 3) from a desire for permanence and intensity to constitutive contingency and superficiality. We conclude by suggesting wider implications that go beyond the scope of this work: the melting pot that blurs the boundaries between culture and entertainment, which undermines the autonomy of the disputed cultural «field» situated between work and leisure (more pleasant than the first, more demanding than the second), and which also erases the boundaries between cultural entertainment and work (a merged environment of «otium and negotium», «homo ludens» and «homo laborans»).
dc.language	Spanish
dc.language	English
dc.publisher	Grupo Comunicar Ediciones
dc.relation	http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C36-2011-03-06
dc.relation	https://doaj.org/toc/1134-3478
dc.relation	https://doaj.org/toc/1988-3293
dc.rights	CC BY-NC-SA
dc.source	Comunicar, Vol XVIII, Iss 36, Pp 149-156 (2011)
dc.subject	Industrias culturales
dc.subject	Industrias del ocio
dc.subject	Industrias del entretenimiento
dc.subject	Industrias creativas
dc.subject	Postproducción
dc.subject	Cultural industries
dc.subject	Leisure industries
dc.subject	Entertainment industries
dc.subject	Creative industries
dc.subject	Postproduction
dc.subject	Cultural field
dc.subject	Communication. Mass media
dc.subject	P87-96
dc.subject	Philology. Linguistics
dc.subject	P1-1091
dc.subject	Language and Literature
dc.subject	P
dc.subject	DOAJ:Media and communication
dc.subject	DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	DOAJ:Education
dc.subject	DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject	Communication. Mass media
dc.subject	P87-96
dc.subject	Philology. Linguistics
dc.subject	P1-1091
dc.subject	Language and Literature
dc.subject	P
dc.subject	DOAJ:Media and communication
dc.subject	DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	DOAJ:Education
dc.subject	DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject	Communication. Mass media
dc.subject	P87-96
dc.subject	Philology. Linguistics
dc.subject	P1-1091
dc.subject	Language and Literature
dc.subject	P
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	Communication. Mass media
dc.subject	P87-96
dc.subject	Philology. Linguistics
dc.subject	P1-1091
dc.subject	Language and Literature
dc.subject	P
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	Communication. Mass media
dc.subject	P87-96
dc.subject	Philology. Linguistics
dc.subject	P1-1091
dc.subject	Language and Literature
dc.subject	P
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.title	De industrias culturales a industrias del ocio y creativas: los límites del «campo» cultural From Cultural Industries to Entertainment and Creative Industries. The Boundaries of the Cultural Field
dc.type	article