dc.creator |
Gerald W. Meisner |
|
dc.creator |
Harol Hoffman |
|
dc.creator |
Mike Turner |
|
dc.date |
2008-05-01T00:00:00Z |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2015-07-20T22:32:56Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2015-07-20T22:32:56Z |
|
dc.identifier |
1870-9095 |
|
dc.identifier |
https://doaj.org/article/abd20452454b4e8dad2a47ec122539e7 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/22599 |
|
dc.description |
With nearly one in five college students taking at least one course online, with nearly every major college anduniversity offering courses and/or programs online and with a growing number of citizens in the work place wantingand needing education in ways which fit their work and personal schedules, e-learning is becoming more importantand ubiquitous each year. The supply (courses) is there in many disciplines; the demand (students and non-students) isthere. The unanswered question is: How good is the product? Is learning taking place? How do we measure thelearning effectiveness of online courses? Are some courses more amenable than others to e-learning? In particular, is itpossible to effectively teach pedagogically sound science courses online? There is little research on many of thesequestions. Of interest to legislators is another important question: Is online learning cost effective? There is a paucityof data here as well, although some argue that it is possible to have e-learning which is cost effective at the margin [1,38] provided that an instructional design model is used wherein there is no one ‘at the end of the phone’ – a modelvery different from that currently used in the online community. We have collected data from student use of a highlyinteractive, virtual physics laboratory that answers some of these questions. Data are from an introductory, algebrabasedintroductory physics course taken mostly by pre-professionals in health fields during the 2005-2006 academicyear. Pre- and post- FCI tests were administered in the fall semester when students studied mechanics. Results showthat a cadre of students taking ‘classwork’ in a virtual, highly interactive physics laboratory environment havenormalized <g> gains [4] on the FCI test [12] which is greater than that of a similar cadre of students in a (physical)modified Modeling Workshop [8] laboratory environment and considerably larger than those in a lecture environment[4]. |
|
dc.language |
English |
|
dc.language |
Spanish |
|
dc.language |
Portuguese |
|
dc.publisher |
Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Latin American Physics Education Network |
|
dc.relation |
http://journal.lapen.org.mx/may08/LAJPE%20163F%20Meisner.pdf |
|
dc.relation |
https://doaj.org/toc/1870-9095 |
|
dc.source |
Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, Vol 2, Iss 2, Pp 87-102 (2008) |
|
dc.subject |
Physics Education |
|
dc.subject |
Physics simulation |
|
dc.subject |
Virtual Physics Laboratory |
|
dc.subject |
Special aspects of education |
|
dc.subject |
LC8-6691 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Education |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Social Sciences |
|
dc.subject |
Special aspects of education |
|
dc.subject |
LC8-6691 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Education |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Social Sciences |
|
dc.subject |
Special aspects of education |
|
dc.subject |
LC8-6691 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
Special aspects of education |
|
dc.subject |
LC8-6691 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
Special aspects of education |
|
dc.subject |
LC8-6691 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.title |
Learning Physics in a Virtual Environment: Is There Any? |
|
dc.type |
article |
|