Think! Evidence

Advancing Assessment of Quantitative and Scientific Reasoning

Show simple item record

dc.creator Donna L. Sundre
dc.creator Amy D. Thelk
dc.date 2010-07-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-08-12T11:17:01Z
dc.date.available 2015-08-12T11:17:01Z
dc.identifier 1936-4660
dc.identifier https://doaj.org/article/a19985967199458e879db44fa12cb97c
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/26028
dc.description Advancing Assessment of Quantitative and Scientific Reasoning is a four-year NSF Project (DUE-0618599) in part designed to evaluate the generalizability of quantitative (QR) and scientific reasoning (SR) assessment instruments created at James Madison University to four other four-year institutions with very distinct missions and student demographics. This article describes the methods, results, and findings we obtained in our studies. More specifically, we describe how to conduct content-alignment exercises in which faculty members map each item from a prospective test to the student learning objectives taught at the institution. Our results indicated that 92-100% of the QR and SR items were successfully mapped to each of the partner institutions’ learning objectives. We also guided the partner institutions on assessing the balance of test items across the intended student learning objectives to assure greater content validity and coverage. The reliability (internal consistency) results from the partner institutions for the learning objectives and major subtests are strikingly similar across very different student populations. We interpret lower reliabilities from one institution to be the result of test administration and student motivation factors, the latter being a serious threat to the health and vigor of any assessment program. Validity study results at the partner institutions add to the evidence of construct validity of the QR and SR instruments. While our studies focus on QR and SR instruments, the methods will apply to other instruments and other institutions as they attempt to answer important questions about student learning outcomes.
dc.language English
dc.publisher University of South Florida Libraries
dc.relation http://dx.doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.3.2.2
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/1936-4660
dc.rights CC BY-NC
dc.source Numeracy, Vol 3, Iss 2, p 2 (2010)
dc.subject quantitative reasoning
dc.subject scientific reasoning
dc.subject assessment
dc.subject collegiate
dc.subject instrument development
dc.subject measurement
dc.subject reliability
dc.subject validity
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Mathematics
dc.subject QA1-939
dc.subject Science
dc.subject Q
dc.subject DOAJ:Mathematics
dc.subject DOAJ:Mathematics and Statistics
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Mathematics
dc.subject QA1-939
dc.subject Science
dc.subject Q
dc.subject DOAJ:Mathematics
dc.subject DOAJ:Mathematics and Statistics
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Mathematics
dc.subject QA1-939
dc.subject Science
dc.subject Q
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Mathematics
dc.subject QA1-939
dc.subject Science
dc.subject Q
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Mathematics
dc.subject QA1-939
dc.subject Science
dc.subject Q
dc.title Advancing Assessment of Quantitative and Scientific Reasoning
dc.type article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account