Think! Evidence

Automated Essay Scoring

Show simple item record

dc.creator Semire DIKLI
dc.date 2006-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-08-12T11:18:13Z
dc.date.available 2015-08-12T11:18:13Z
dc.identifier 1302-6488
dc.identifier https://doaj.org/article/9d3c80c03c634902b4c8dbce6e160510
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/26753
dc.description Automated Essay Scoring Semire DIKLI Florida State University Tallahassee, FL, USA ABSTRACT The impacts of computers on writing have been widely studied for three decades. Even basic computers functions, i.e. word processing, have been of great assistance to writers in modifying their essays. The research on Automated Essay Scoring (AES) has revealed that computers have the capacity to function as a more effective cognitive tool (Attali, 2004). AES is defined as the computer technology that evaluates and scores the written prose (Shermis & Barrera, 2002; Shermis & Burstein, 2003; Shermis, Raymat, & Barrera, 2003). Revision and feedback are essential aspects of the writing process. Students need to receive feedback in order to increase their writing quality. However, responding to student papers can be a burden for teachers. Particularly if they have large number of students and if they assign frequent writing assignments, providing individual feedback to student essays might be quite time consuming. AES systems can be very useful because they can provide the student with a score as well as feedback within seconds (Page, 2003). Four types of AES systems, which are widely used by testing companies, universities, and public schools: Project Essay Grader (PEG), Intelligent Essay Assessor (IEA), E-rater, and IntelliMetric. AES is a developing technology. Many AES systems are used to overcome time, cost, and generalizability issues in writing assessment. The accuracy and reliability of these systems have been proven to be high. The search for excellence in machine scoring of essays is continuing and numerous studies are being conducted to improve the effectiveness of the AES systems.
dc.language English
dc.publisher Anadolu University, Eskisehir, Turkey
dc.relation http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde21/pdf/article_5.pdf
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/1302-6488
dc.source The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 49-62 (2006)
dc.subject Assessment
dc.subject Writing
dc.subject Feedback Mechanism
dc.subject
dc.subject Assistive Technologies
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.title Automated Essay Scoring
dc.type article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account