Think! Evidence

Student Engagement with a Science Simulation: Aspects that Matter

Show simple item record

dc.creator Susan Rodrigues
dc.creator Eugene Gvozdenko
dc.date 2011-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-08-12T11:18:22Z
dc.date.available 2015-08-12T11:18:22Z
dc.identifier 1855-9719
dc.identifier 2232-2647
dc.identifier https://doaj.org/article/9c8a03ed87a34cafbb302db60ae51d09
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/26861
dc.description It is argued that multimedia technology affords an opportunity to better visualise complex relationships often seen in chemistry. This paper describes the influence of chemistry simulation design facets on user progress through a simulation. Three versions of an acid-base titration simulation were randomly allocated to 36 volunteers to examine their interactions with the simulation. The impact of design alterations on the total number of interactions and their patterns was analysed for the following factors: (a) the place of a feature on the screen, (b) alignment of the sequence of instructions, (c) additional instruction before the simulation, (d) interactivity of a feature. Additionally, interactions between individual factors, such as age, prior experience with science simulations and computer games, perception of the difficulty of science simulations, and general subject knowledge, on one hand, and the efficiency of using the simulation, on the other hand, were examined. The findings suggestthat: (a) centrality of the position of an element significantly affects the number of interactions with the element, (b) re-arranging the sequence of instructions on the screen in left-to-right order improves the following of instructions, (c) providing users with additional written advice to follow numbered instructions does not have a significant impact on student behaviour, (d) interactivity of a feature was found to have a strong positive correlation with the number of interactions with that feature, which warrants a caution about unnecessary interactivity that may hinder simulation efficiency. Surprisingly, neither prior knowledge of chemistry nor theage of the participants had a significant effect on either the number of interactions or the ability to follow on-screen instructions.
dc.language English
dc.language Slovene
dc.publisher University of Ljubljana
dc.relation http://www.cepsj.si/pdfs/cepsj_1_4/cepsj_1_4_pp027-043_rodrigues_etal.pdf
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/1855-9719
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/2232-2647
dc.rights CC BY
dc.source CEPS Journal : Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, Vol 1, Iss 4, Pp 27-43 (2011)
dc.subject Chemistry
dc.subject Educational simulations
dc.subject Learning
dc.subject Instructions
dc.subject Interactivity
dc.subject Simulation design
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.title Student Engagement with a Science Simulation: Aspects that Matter
dc.type article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account