dc.creator |
Jian Wang |
|
dc.creator |
Emily Lin |
|
dc.creator |
Madalina Tanase |
|
dc.creator |
Midena Sas |
|
dc.date |
2008-02-01T00:00:00Z |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2015-08-12T11:18:29Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2015-08-12T11:18:29Z |
|
dc.identifier |
1306-3030 |
|
dc.identifier |
https://doaj.org/article/9bf4f9c8c31d4e06aa739206252cf261 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/26954 |
|
dc.description |
Eastern Asian students repeatedly outperform U.S. students in mathematics. Some suggest that number-naming languages consistent with the base-10 number system found in many Eastern Asian countries presumably contribute to their students’ better understanding of the base-10 system and consequential performance. Such language features do not exist in English or other Western languages. The current study tests this assumption by comparing base-10 knowledge of students in kindergarten and first-grade from China, Romania, and U.S. who have developed number-naming language abilities but received relatively little formal school instruction. It is expected that since Chinese number-naming is linguistically more transparent and consistent with the base-10 system, Chinese students should outperform both their Romanian and U.S. peers. Romanians should show intermediate performance between Chinese and U.S. students since Romanian language is somewhat transparent and consistent with a base-10 system while English number-naming language is least consistent. However, the analysis of this study revealed that although Chinese children outperformed both Romanian and U.S. counterparts in accomplishing base-10 tasks, there were no significant differences between Romanian and U.S. children. This finding suggests that the extent to which number-naming language is linguistically transparent and consistent with the base-10 system may not necessarily align with the level of children’s understanding of the base-10 system and relevant mathematics performances. |
|
dc.language |
English |
|
dc.publisher |
Gokkusagi Ltd. |
|
dc.relation |
http://www.iejme.com/012008/d2.pdf |
|
dc.relation |
https://doaj.org/toc/1306-3030 |
|
dc.source |
International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, Vol 3, Iss 1, Pp 24-46 (2008) |
|
dc.subject |
Asian |
|
dc.subject |
American |
|
dc.subject |
Romanian |
|
dc.subject |
Language |
|
dc.subject |
Cognitive Representation. |
|
dc.subject |
Education (General) |
|
dc.subject |
L7-991 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Education |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Social Sciences |
|
dc.subject |
Mathematics |
|
dc.subject |
QA1-939 |
|
dc.subject |
Science |
|
dc.subject |
Q |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Mathematics |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Mathematics and Statistics |
|
dc.subject |
Education (General) |
|
dc.subject |
L7-991 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Education |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Social Sciences |
|
dc.subject |
Mathematics |
|
dc.subject |
QA1-939 |
|
dc.subject |
Science |
|
dc.subject |
Q |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Mathematics |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Mathematics and Statistics |
|
dc.subject |
Education (General) |
|
dc.subject |
L7-991 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
Mathematics |
|
dc.subject |
QA1-939 |
|
dc.subject |
Science |
|
dc.subject |
Q |
|
dc.subject |
Education (General) |
|
dc.subject |
L7-991 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
Mathematics |
|
dc.subject |
QA1-939 |
|
dc.subject |
Science |
|
dc.subject |
Q |
|
dc.subject |
Education (General) |
|
dc.subject |
L7-991 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
Mathematics |
|
dc.subject |
QA1-939 |
|
dc.subject |
Science |
|
dc.subject |
Q |
|
dc.title |
Revisiting the Influence of Numerical Language Characteristics on Mathematics Achievement: Comparison among China, Romania, and U.S. |
|
dc.type |
article |
|