Think! Evidence

Teachers’ Perceptions about the Efficiency of Analysis and Synthesis Methods in Teaching Reading and Writing of First Graders

Show simple item record

dc.creator Ruhan KARADAĞ
dc.creator Mehmet GÜLTEKİN
dc.date 2007-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-08-12T11:19:31Z
dc.date.available 2015-08-12T11:19:31Z
dc.identifier 1304-9496
dc.identifier https://doaj.org/article/97a91d238d8045d4b5ac64f10d93dd1a
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/27661
dc.description The aim of the present study is to figure out the perceptions of teachers regarding the efficiency of the two methods, namely, the “analysis” and “synthesis” methods, used in teaching reading and writing to first graders. The data of the study was collected through the survey method and participants of the study were 22 teachers working in 15 Primary Schools in Eskişehir during the 2004-2005 academic year. In order to get in-depth understanding about the perceptions of the teachers, a semi structured interview technique, one of the qualitative research methods, was used in the data collecting process. In the analysis of the data, a descriptive analysis technique was used and the findings of the study were paraphrased in numbers. The findings of the study indicated that the participants believe that the analysis method is more advantageous than the synthesis method for first graders in terms of improving their reading comprehension skills, increasing their speed in learning to read and write, fostering their cognitive development, and refining their individual differences. Additionally, the findings of the present study revealed that teachers have encountered a variety of problems while practicing both of the methods.
dc.language English
dc.language Turkish
dc.publisher Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University
dc.relation http://eku.comu.edu.tr/index/3/1/rkaradag_gultekin.pdf
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/1304-9496
dc.source Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, Vol 3, Iss 1, Pp 102-121 (2007)
dc.subject teaching first reading and writing
dc.subject analysis and synthesis methods.
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.title Teachers’ Perceptions about the Efficiency of Analysis and Synthesis Methods in Teaching Reading and Writing of First Graders
dc.type article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account