dc.creator |
Kirby Fran |
|
dc.creator |
Fleet Lisa J |
|
dc.creator |
Curran Vernon R |
|
dc.date |
2010-01-01T00:00:00Z |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2015-08-12T11:20:20Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2015-08-12T11:20:20Z |
|
dc.identifier |
10.1186/1472-6920-10-10 |
|
dc.identifier |
1472-6920 |
|
dc.identifier |
https://doaj.org/article/945589658091468bbe51312e59915962 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/28191 |
|
dc.description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Internet-based instruction in continuing medical education (CME) has been associated with favorable outcomes. However, more direct comparative studies of different Internet-based interventions, instructional methods, presentation formats, and approaches to implementation are needed. The purpose of this study was to conduct a comparative evaluation of two Internet-based CME delivery formats and the effect on satisfaction, knowledge and confidence outcomes.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Evaluative outcomes of two differing formats of an Internet-based CME course with identical subject matter were compared. A Scheduled Group Learning format involved case-based asynchronous discussions with peers and a facilitator over a scheduled 3-week delivery period. An eCME On Demand format did not include facilitated discussion and was not based on a schedule; participants could start and finish at any time. A retrospective, pre-post evaluation study design comparing identical satisfaction, knowledge and confidence outcome measures was conducted.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Participants in the Scheduled Group Learning format reported significantly higher mean satisfaction ratings in some areas, performed significantly higher on a post-knowledge assessment and reported significantly higher post-confidence scores than participants in the eCME On Demand format that was not scheduled and did not include facilitated discussion activity.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The findings support the instructional benefits of a scheduled delivery format and facilitated asynchronous discussion in Internet-based CME.</p> |
|
dc.language |
English |
|
dc.publisher |
BioMed Central |
|
dc.relation |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/10/10 |
|
dc.relation |
https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6920 |
|
dc.rights |
CC BY |
|
dc.source |
BMC Medical Education, Vol 10, Iss 1, p 10 (2010) |
|
dc.subject |
Medicine (General) |
|
dc.subject |
R5-920 |
|
dc.subject |
Medicine |
|
dc.subject |
R |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Medicine (General) |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Health Sciences |
|
dc.subject |
Special aspects of education |
|
dc.subject |
LC8-6691 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Education |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Social Sciences |
|
dc.subject |
Medicine (General) |
|
dc.subject |
R5-920 |
|
dc.subject |
Medicine |
|
dc.subject |
R |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Medicine (General) |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Health Sciences |
|
dc.subject |
Special aspects of education |
|
dc.subject |
LC8-6691 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Education |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Social Sciences |
|
dc.subject |
Medicine (General) |
|
dc.subject |
R5-920 |
|
dc.subject |
Medicine |
|
dc.subject |
R |
|
dc.subject |
Special aspects of education |
|
dc.subject |
LC8-6691 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
Medicine (General) |
|
dc.subject |
R5-920 |
|
dc.subject |
Medicine |
|
dc.subject |
R |
|
dc.subject |
Special aspects of education |
|
dc.subject |
LC8-6691 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
Medicine (General) |
|
dc.subject |
R5-920 |
|
dc.subject |
Medicine |
|
dc.subject |
R |
|
dc.subject |
Special aspects of education |
|
dc.subject |
LC8-6691 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.title |
A comparative evaluation of the effect of internet-based CME delivery format on satisfaction, knowledge and confidence |
|
dc.type |
article |
|