Think! Evidence

Pedagogical correlates of reading comprehension in English and Chinese.

Show simple item record

dc.creator Westwood, P.
dc.creator Loh, E.K.Y.
dc.creator Lam, R.Y.H.
dc.creator Lam, J.W.I.
dc.creator Tse, S.K.
dc.date 2007-07-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-08-12T11:20:32Z
dc.date.available 2015-08-12T11:20:32Z
dc.identifier 1567-6617
dc.identifier 1573-1731
dc.identifier https://doaj.org/article/933eb32d3a444e64bdf1c866629f8d04
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/28342
dc.description This study conducted in Hong Kong used multiple regression procedures to investigate the relationship between primary school children’s reading test scores and the frequency with which fortytwo instructional practices were used by their literacy teachers. Analyses were conducted separately for reading in English language and in Chinese (Modern Standard Written Chinese). Subjects comprised4,329 Cantonese-speaking students (2,157 girls; 2,172 boys) aged approximately 9+ years, and their 256 teachers (129 teachers of English; 127 teachers of Chinese). Results suggest that no single instructional practice was highly correlated with students’ reading achievement in English or Chinese, and in fact some practices demonstrated a negative association. However, certain practices, particularly related to the use and nature of resource materials and to assessment strategies, did demonstrate a positive association with reading performance. Similarities and differences between Chinese and English data are discussed.
dc.language English
dc.publisher IAIMTE
dc.relation http://l1.publication-archive.com/public?fn=enter&repository=1&article=233
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/1567-6617
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/1573-1731
dc.rights CC BY-NC-ND
dc.source L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, Vol 7, Iss 2, Pp 71-91 (2007)
dc.subject Literacy
dc.subject Reading Chinese
dc.subject Reading English as a Second Language
dc.subject Reading instruction
dc.subject Teaching reading
dc.subject Philology. Linguistics
dc.subject P1-1091
dc.subject Language and Literature
dc.subject P
dc.subject DOAJ:Linguistics
dc.subject DOAJ:Languages and Literatures
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Philology. Linguistics
dc.subject P1-1091
dc.subject Language and Literature
dc.subject P
dc.subject DOAJ:Linguistics
dc.subject DOAJ:Languages and Literatures
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Philology. Linguistics
dc.subject P1-1091
dc.subject Language and Literature
dc.subject P
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Philology. Linguistics
dc.subject P1-1091
dc.subject Language and Literature
dc.subject P
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Philology. Linguistics
dc.subject P1-1091
dc.subject Language and Literature
dc.subject P
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.title Pedagogical correlates of reading comprehension in English and Chinese.
dc.type article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account