Think! Evidence

Distance Students’ Readiness for Social Media and Collaboration

Show simple item record

dc.creator Bruno Poellhuber
dc.creator Terry Anderson
dc.date 2011-10-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-08-12T11:21:00Z
dc.date.available 2015-08-12T11:21:00Z
dc.identifier 1492-3831
dc.identifier https://doaj.org/article/9174645b373e47899efce437daa40b8a
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/28630
dc.description In recent years, there has been a rapid growth in the use of social networking tools (e.g., Facebook) and social media in general, mainly for social, recreational, and entertainment purposes (Smith, Salaway, & Caruso, 2009). Many educators believe that these tools offer new educational affordances and avenues for students to interact with each other and with their teachers or tutors. Considering the traditional dropout rate problem documented in distance courses (Rovai, 2003; Woodley, 2004), these tools may be of special interest for distance education institutions as they have the potential to assist in the critical “social integration” associated with persistence (Sweet, 1986; Tinto, 1975). However, as distance students are typically older than regular on-campus students (Bean & Metzner, 1985; Rovai, 2003), little is known about their expertise with social media or their interest in harnessing these tools for informal learning or collaborating with peers.To investigate these issues, an online questionnaire was distributed to students from four large Canadian distance education institutions. A systematic sampling procedure led to 3,462 completed questionnaires. The results show that students have diverse views and experiences, but they also show strong and significant age and gender differences in a variety of measures, as well as an important institution effect on the student’s interest in collaboration. Males and younger students scored higher on almost all indicators (past teamwork experience, cooperative preferences, attitudes toward technology, experience with social software, etc.). These age and gender differences should be interpreted cautiously, however, as they are based on self-reported measures. The limits of the study, as well as future developments and research questions, are outlined.
dc.language English
dc.publisher Athabasca University
dc.relation http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1018/1960
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/1492-3831
dc.rights CC BY
dc.source International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Vol 12, Iss 6 (2011)
dc.subject Distance education
dc.subject social software
dc.subject web conferencing
dc.subject collaboration
dc.subject social presence
dc.subject technology
dc.subject transparency
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.title Distance Students’ Readiness for Social Media and Collaboration
dc.type article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account