dc.creator |
Gwendolyn Kolfschoten |
|
dc.creator |
Niki Frantzeskaki |
|
dc.creator |
Alexander de Haan |
|
dc.creator |
Alexander Verbraeck |
|
dc.date |
2008-12-01T00:00:00Z |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2015-08-12T11:21:34Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2015-08-12T11:21:34Z |
|
dc.identifier |
1750-0044 |
|
dc.identifier |
1750-0052 |
|
dc.identifier |
https://doaj.org/article/8eb9965a492844bdb955266b169e724b |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/29027 |
|
dc.description |
Modelling is one of the critical skills that engineering students need to acquire. Models are used to represent complex processes or systems in order to enhance understanding of a particular aspect. Hence, models need to be constructed in such a way that information and understanding of a complex reality can be reduced to a pragmatic assessment at the project level. In modelling education we find a paradox. The end-result of a modelling exercise is, by definition, a less complex representation of the system or process that is studied. Therefore, when providing examples of a modelling task, the true complexity of the analysis and process is often underestimated. Consequently, studying worked examples of a model or observing a teacher during the modelling process is insufficient to learn how to analyse and to model a system or a process. The difficulty of the task is only experienced and understood when students try to model by themselves. However, from the authors’ experience, this is difficult to accomplish in a classroom setting. In this study we tested a new method for a modelling lab: a semi-structured interactive workshop in which students work in groups on large whiteboards using flexible modelling blocks. We evaluated the method using a questionnaire and the results are encouraging. |
|
dc.language |
English |
|
dc.publisher |
The Higher Education Academy |
|
dc.relation |
http://www.engsc.ac.uk/journal/index.php/ee/article/view/107/138 |
|
dc.relation |
https://doaj.org/toc/1750-0044 |
|
dc.relation |
https://doaj.org/toc/1750-0052 |
|
dc.rights |
CC BY-NC-ND |
|
dc.source |
Engineering Education, Vol 3, Iss 2, Pp 21-27 (2008) |
|
dc.subject |
collaborative planning |
|
dc.subject |
engineering education |
|
dc.subject |
modelling |
|
dc.subject |
Education (General) |
|
dc.subject |
L7-991 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Education |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Social Sciences |
|
dc.subject |
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
|
dc.subject |
TA1-2040 |
|
dc.subject |
Technology |
|
dc.subject |
T |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:General and Civil Engineering |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Technology and Engineering |
|
dc.subject |
Education (General) |
|
dc.subject |
L7-991 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Education |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Social Sciences |
|
dc.subject |
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
|
dc.subject |
TA1-2040 |
|
dc.subject |
Technology |
|
dc.subject |
T |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:General and Civil Engineering |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Technology and Engineering |
|
dc.subject |
Education (General) |
|
dc.subject |
L7-991 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
|
dc.subject |
TA1-2040 |
|
dc.subject |
Technology |
|
dc.subject |
T |
|
dc.subject |
Education (General) |
|
dc.subject |
L7-991 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
|
dc.subject |
TA1-2040 |
|
dc.subject |
Technology |
|
dc.subject |
T |
|
dc.subject |
Education (General) |
|
dc.subject |
L7-991 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
|
dc.subject |
TA1-2040 |
|
dc.subject |
Technology |
|
dc.subject |
T |
|
dc.title |
Collaborative modelling lab to increase learning engagement |
|
dc.type |
article |
|