Think! Evidence

To Identify the Suggestions for Streamlining the Professional Training Programme of the Future Teaching Staff in Romania

Show simple item record

dc.creator Laura SERBANESCU
dc.date 2012-04-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-08-12T11:23:51Z
dc.date.available 2015-08-12T11:23:51Z
dc.identifier 2066-7329
dc.identifier 2067-9270
dc.identifier https://doaj.org/article/8a35b5e478a5449f8748efd76262cbb4
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/29769
dc.description The research, performed in the interval 2010-2011, has an ascertainmentimprovement character. We performed this research taking the following main directions: investigating the trainers’ opinions, on the one hand, and those of these training programmes beneficiaries, on the other hand. As for the trainers, they represent the teaching staff in the departments responsible for training the future teachers within the specialised universities. As for the beneficiaries, in the research they target both the students – as future beneficiaries of psycho-pedagogical training, and the practitioners in education – novice teaching staff. In the research we included among the target groups a third category of subjects, represented by the inspectors responsible for lifelong training. From a methodological perspective, as survey technique, we used the questionnaire-based survey. We administered the survey tools to representative samples of the four target populations, specifying that the sample of school inspectors covers the entire target population that is represented, the questionnaires being administered to the school inspectors responsible for lifelong training in all the 42 counties. Consequently, all the four samples are representative of the target population: TTD students, academic teaching staff within TTD, novice teaching staff in the pre-university education and inspectors responsible for lifelong training. The diversity of structures resulting from the analysis of the target population features allows us to state that the results (information/opinions) obtained on the basis of the questionnaire reflects the opinions of the diversity of situations/ conditions/ socio-educational environments/training levels etc., which characterise the education system.
dc.language English
dc.language Romanian
dc.publisher Lumen
dc.relation http://revistaromaneasca.ro/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/5-To-Identify1.pdf
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/2066-7329
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/2067-9270
dc.rights CC BY-NC-ND
dc.source Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, Vol 4, Iss 1, Pp 57-68 (2012)
dc.subject curricular
dc.subject training programmes
dc.subject psycho-pedagogical studies programme
dc.subject teaching career
dc.subject professional competences.
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.title To Identify the Suggestions for Streamlining the Professional Training Programme of the Future Teaching Staff in Romania
dc.type article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account