Think! Evidence

Assessing medical students’ competence in calculating drug doses

Show simple item record

dc.creator Catherine Harries
dc.creator Julia Botha
dc.date 2013-09-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-08-12T11:29:17Z
dc.date.available 2015-08-12T11:29:17Z
dc.identifier 10.4102/pythagoras.v34i2.186
dc.identifier 1012-2346
dc.identifier 2223-7895
dc.identifier https://doaj.org/article/836b9907ac0c473ea178152b84ba5eb9
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/30811
dc.description Evidence suggests that healthcare professionals are not optimally able to calculate medicine doses and various strategies have been employed to improve these skills. In this study, the performance of third and fourth year medical students was assessed and the success of various educational interventions investigated. Students were given four types of dosing calculations typical of those required in an emergency setting. Full competence (at the 100% level) was defined as correctly answering all four categories of calculation at any one time. Three categories correct meant competence at the 75% level. Interventions comprised an assignment with a model answer for self-assessment in the third year and a small group tutorial in the fourth year. The small groups provided opportunities for peer-assisted learning. A subgroup of 23 students received individual tuition from the lecturer prior to the start of the fourth year. Amongst the 364 eligible students, full competence rose from 23% at the beginning of the third year to 66% by the end of the fourth year. More students succeeded during the fourth than the third year of study. Success of small group tuition was assessed in a sample of 200 students who had formal assessments both before and after the fourth year tuition. Competence at the 75% level improved by 10% in attendees and decreased by 3% in non-attendees, providing evidence of the value of students receiving assistance from more able same-language peers. Good results were achieved with one-on-one tuition where individualised assistance allowed even struggling students to improve.
dc.language English
dc.publisher AOSIS OpenJournals
dc.relation http://www.pythagoras.org.za/index.php/pythagoras/article/view/186
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/1012-2346
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/2223-7895
dc.rights CC BY
dc.source Pythagoras, Vol 34, Iss 2, Pp 1-9 (2013)
dc.subject Assessment
dc.subject Training
dc.subject Teaching
dc.subject Dosage calculations
dc.subject Mathematics of work
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Mathematics
dc.subject QA1-939
dc.subject Science
dc.subject Q
dc.subject DOAJ:Mathematics
dc.subject DOAJ:Mathematics and Statistics
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Mathematics
dc.subject QA1-939
dc.subject Science
dc.subject Q
dc.subject DOAJ:Mathematics
dc.subject DOAJ:Mathematics and Statistics
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Mathematics
dc.subject QA1-939
dc.subject Science
dc.subject Q
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Mathematics
dc.subject QA1-939
dc.subject Science
dc.subject Q
dc.subject Special aspects of education
dc.subject LC8-6691
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Mathematics
dc.subject QA1-939
dc.subject Science
dc.subject Q
dc.title Assessing medical students’ competence in calculating drug doses
dc.type article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account